No, research is not the only way to ensure the quality of Indian academia.

My take is:

  • Teaching based on industry experience is the best combination for continuous improvement of quality of HE.
  • The categorization of HE institutions into   three main kinds of institutions: Teaching institutions (TIs), Teaching-cum-research institutions (TRIs); and Research-focused institutions (RIs) is right, obvious,  so essential for overall national development and prosperity as each is focused on one primary function  supported by remaining others  two. But teaching remains more or less a common component for all teachers (faculty)  irrespective of the said types of institutes.
  • Any University Act defines approved Principal to AP, Librarian and many more officiating in the university as "teacher".
  • There is no denying that inclusion of research  in API has diverted  the faculty  focus from teaching  giving undue focus/importance  to research for in CAS  PhD qualification is linked with faculty salary.
  • Is it really necessary to possess Ph D degree for teaching UG/PG  classes? I sincerely think it is not.
  • In short, salary be linked with job performance at any faculty level (AP, AsP and P) and not merely to degrees, i.e. an experienced PG graduate faculty needs to get, if found eligible otherwise,  the same salary as that of Associate Professor and Professor. As per AICTE CAS provisions 75% posts of Professors are reserved for Assistant Professors. AICTE can suitably amend the existing recruitment/CAS  norms based on the type of institute, linked with job performance,  without any faculty salary structure discrimination.
  • Promotion is not a matter of right, however.
  • More 𝕻𝖗𝖔𝖋 𝕭𝖍𝖔𝖑𝖆𝖓𝖆𝖙𝖍 𝕯𝖚𝖙𝖙𝖆's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions