I think no.

Because Agricultural Education is the field science and in private institutions, they didn't provide the practical knowledge of agriculture and fields.

If private people can match the infrastructure and man power to that of the centrally funded institutes then govt. must promote such institutes

True education ideally requires proper and dynamic teaching as well as learning environment. It demands infrastructural facilities as well as visionary wisdom.

Agricultural education is not much different from any other education excepting its more practicable appriach and direct linkage with human beings, social dependence, ecological and economical pursuits and need-based market-driven situation soecific manifestations.

The role of government or private institute makes no difference when the question of facilitating educational environment comes in the forefront. Proper planning and its execution should be the priority area. Funding should be assured. Management are to take the decisive role in a sound way whenever necessary, wherever applicable and with a fkexibility to whatever extent possible.

Totally not advisable ,at least in Asia where corrupt system prevails and cash for degrees will deteriorate everything.

It's not good, because privatization of education means commercialization of education. When education is commercialized, the proprietors of institutions consider profit as the main criteria, as a result of which education becomes a business losing its value.

A privatization of education is not good because the risk is to indoctrinate learners in philosophies and approaches without giving them opportunities to explore and experience other ideas. Private sponsors may easily dictate an implementation of curricula and a research agenda that does not have anything, or much to do with education, but rather than "training" graduates to increase the profits of the private sponsor.

Good subject to provision of all quality infrastructure and facilities along with experienced faculty for experiential learning as well research in all fields of agriculture

Too early for India, as the investments on infrastructure required are huge and returns may not happen on commercial terms.

This is a highly debatable question in current situation. Hopely in near future we shall be able to interpret this situation better. Regards

According to me, privatization is not the problem rather "NON-REGULATION" of private educational institutes in all fields of science and related fields of studies is the major cause behind the widespread hatreds for private institutes. Due to partial or complete autonomy especially regarding monetary aspects, the private institutes are often conceived as "MONEY-BASED INSTITUTES" as compared to their Government counterparts.

Regards.

It's not about all but most of the private institutes focus on quantitative educational aspects rather than qualitative aspects. Privatisation surely decline the quality as they lack in adequate facilities such as infrastructure, faculty etc.

Not good of Agriculture in privatization.