NO! Schrodinger's intuition is co-recht - but the western "scientific" interpretation is non-co-recht.

Please change the spelling in the title!

The source question mentions something like a revolutionary reformulation of the classic Schrödinger PDE that we've never heard of.

Can you explain the proposed reformulation and its superiority over the classic Schrödinger PDE, if any?

*The classic Schrödinger equation,i h dΨ/dt)partial=-h2/2m. Nabla^2 Ψ+ V Ψ . . . . (1)

OR,

H^Ψ = EΨ. . . . . (1*)

reduced form, should be conveniently replaced by its square Ψ^2[1*] to conform to the Laplacian PDE and the Laplacian theorem in general, which makes sense and makes sense.

as,

dU/dt)partial=D.Nabla^2 U +S(x,y,z,t) . . . . . . (2)

where U=ψ^2=ψψ*.

It should be noted that the square of the classic Shrödinger PDE, which is equation 2, must be completed by the basic rule of the source term in vacuum dynamics, namely:

S(x,y,z,t) =Constant * V(x,y,z,t) . . . . (3)

Equations 2,3 versus equation 1 are like a huge jumble going from zero or dwarf capabilities to almost infinite capabilities in classical and quantum physics in addition to applied mathematics.

Here in question number 2 we explain how equation 3 solves for loudness in audio rooms and how it can derive and generate the Boltzmann distribution for the first time in 100 years.

Needless to say, the classic Schrödinger equation cannot solve or even address either of the two problems above.

On the other hand, the proposed square of the classical Schrödinger PDE called statistical Laplacian PDE is capable of [1]:

1-Describe and calculate the numerical solution for sound wave intensity and its reverberation time in audio rooms for the first time in the last 100 years.

Additionally, it predicts and measures the speed of sound waves at the NTP at 330 m s^-1.

2-Describe and calculate the numerical solution for the thermal conduction/diffusion energy density (temperature in degrees Kelvin) when the Dirichlet boundary conditions and the initial conditions vector are arbitrarily specified simultaneously, which has never been carried out previously.

Additionally, it predicts and measures the EMW signal speed in  metals as the light wave speed in vacuum at 3E8 m s^-1.

Which validates the assertion: Schrodinger's equation is fundamentally incomplete and the proposed square is more understandable and more complete.

1-Useless mathematics - The complex untold story, November 2024.