Given the ongoing geopolitical and economic developments, especially over the past decade, the term "Rise of China" has frequently been used to describe China's growing influence. However, with China's established role as a global power across various sectors, does the term "rise" still accurately reflect China's current position in the international system? Or is it time to adopt new terminology or perspectives to describe this increasing influence?
Thank you for your insights
Dear mam,
Greetings!
I have recently joined here on ResearchGate. I will add my research here shortly. So, sorry for the convenience till then.
Meanwhile, answering your question, I would like to request you to please visit these two links where I have published my articles..
China’s Economic Crisis: Global Impacts And Strategic Takeaways
https://pratikbharati.medium.com/chinas-economic-crisis-global-impacts-and-strategic-takeaways-80ea1d6942aa
Countering China Shock: A Global Strategy for Economic Resilience
https://pratikbharati.medium.com/countering-china-shock-a-global-strategy-for-economic-resilience-d42a46446280
Hope, this will help you to find your answer or at least will help you in setting the context.
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Pratik Bharati
Dear Pratik,
Thank you so much for your kind response and for sharing your articles! I truly appreciate your time and effort in providing these resources, and I look forward to reading them.
The topics you’ve addressed are highly relevant to my research, especially in understanding the global implications of China’s economic situation. I will certainly take a closer look at both articles.
Thanks again, and I wish you all the best with your upcoming research contributions on ResearchGate!
Best regards,
Asma
China is still a developing country and many Chinese are still very poor when compared to Western countries. I think "rise" is still an accurate word to describe China's trend.
Are there ‘safe’ areas of research collaboration with China?
"As research collaboration with China – already subject to ‘decoupling’ by the United States and more intense scrutiny by European countries – becomes even more precarious, academics and experts are looking at possible ‘safe’ areas of research where collaborations can continue amid geopolitical tensions...
Global challenges are another area of collaboration seen as relatively safe from geopolitical tensions. This area includes health, biodiversity, research on natural disasters and disaster mitigation, food security, and other areas..."
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20250213061756423
China doubles US chip-research output
"There are signs that China is now producing most of the basic research that could underpin future computing hardware. An analysis found that, between 2018 and 2023, research papers on chip design and fabrication included authors affiliated with Chinese institutions more than twice as often as they did US ones. Researchers in China also excelled when it came to highly cited papers. If this work develops into commercial applications, the United States might soon find it impossible to use export controls to retain its competitive advantage in the field, the study’s authors say."
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00666-3
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Statistical Techniques
- Meta-Analysis