In kilograms the weight is measured. To calculate the mass, divide c2 / e = M, e = mc2. The neutrino does not turn into energy at the speed of light, but can change when it reaches or reaches the speed of light to the square. So what would be the mass if it is not a burden? The mass could be the sum of the particles that make up the object, but not the weight. Deliberate mass could be the amount of electrical transmission that contains the particle. Its electric potential. Then accelerated it would turn into energy. Then e=c2*(W/q0)
Dear Piotr,
just a remark:
the unit of weight is not kilograms or grams but Newton (N) because the weight is a force. For details please have a look at the links.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass
Dear colleague! It is a matter of units and definitions not phenomena.
Dear Gerhard, mass is not force, I suppose that is quantity of object but other then kg. I I have calculated that the force of gravity is 2.5% of mass, measured in kg. But now I have a problem whether the mass is the same as the weight. Next i suppose that mass it could be energetic potential of object.
Dear Piotr,
you are right: mass is not force; but weight is force (due to gravity experienced by the mass of an object.) and its unit is N (Newton) not kg.
There is no dicussion.
kg is the unit of mass; there is also no discussion. Thats also law in all countries participating in the SI system of units . Please see the link on SI units and metrication.
The mass of 1 kg has a weight of 1kg*go = 9,8 kg*m/s² = 9,8 N; with go as the standard gravity (please see the 2nd link) and 1N = 1kg*m/s².
Piotr, it is not my intension to confuse you, but please note that the weight of that 1kg of mass will be different on different positions at the earth due to the fact that the gravity g is not constant at the surface of the earth (please see the 3rd link).
In order to get more familiar with that subject get please have a look at classical text books of that subject or at least read the link I have attached in my answer above.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_gravity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrication
Newton is a dynamic force, we measure with this pattern the displacement of the object, such as someone is pushing the trolley and interacting with it by force x Newtones to make the trolley move. The gravitation hypothesis I measured in kg is based on experiments with weights weighing less than each other on the electronic scale together. Weight loss is 2.5% of one weight. I do not know why weight is less but for me it is fact. I suppose thath this is force of gravitation, That is the attraction of bodies I'm not talking about circling platen around the star.
Yes, Piotr, you got it.
Weight is force due to gravitation, thus attraction of two bodies via their masses.
In the case of weight of a sample one of the masses is that of your sample and the other mass is that of the earth.
Thank You. I make experiment ourselfe and need criticism and confirmation. But why masses of two conected bodies is less then separate. I thought then kg is weight, not mass, and formula of Newtons could not solve this. Mass could be (w/q0)c^2=energetic potential then jus e. Maybe energetic potential is reduced when objects is conected. I know the kilo weighs the same as a kilo of lead, but the uranium's energy potential is different from hydrogen, although their kilogram weighs the same
But this 2,5% is for objects who got the same weight. I don't know how is in other examples.
This discussion may interest you.
https://philpapers.org/bbs/thread.pl?tId=3934#p26042
- Badges
- Science topic