@Maria Aparecida De Jesus, I would also like to point out that human beings are prone to errors and some may be biased. Nobody will admit this publicly.
Anyway, regardless of the motives, one should be entitled to receive explanations. Lack of technical reasons bring in doubts about the revision process.
The most logical consideration when rejecting a data is when it does not concern your research work at all. However, if two research data published in the same issue and both have different perspective in relation to your research work, it is not logical to reject one of them, but it is also important to consider the data that opposes your research work.
Sometimes, the rejection is based on the size of paper and the number of papers in the journal issue.
However, if the editor did not justify the rejection, you can write to the editorial board and ask.
As a reviewer, once my review was dismissed because they have gotten 2 out of 3 positive reviews. Mine was not favorable and reverted what could be a great injustice.
Other common reason for rejection is poor English but you can fix it. Anyway, you are entitled to receive technical reasons.
@Maria Aparecida De Jesus, I would also like to point out that human beings are prone to errors and some may be biased. Nobody will admit this publicly.
Anyway, regardless of the motives, one should be entitled to receive explanations. Lack of technical reasons bring in doubts about the revision process.
Three are two published papers in same Journal, same issue.
One of them indexed in Scopus database ( means you can find this paper in Scopus ) another not but the second paper not indexed and Scopus reject our request to upload it. So is that logic?