Hi everyone.

I have nonnormal data. I want to do confirmatory factor analysis. So I'm using a robust technique (MLM) with R. When I use MLM estimator without deletion anything, it results bad fit indices. If I firstly delete influential outliers according to mahalanobis distance(p < 0.001) then use MLM, I get acceptable fit indices. But I am confused about whether is true method or overfitting.

On the other hand, as I understand I should report results with and without deletion outliers. I want to ask, if I report with/without, can I say the study provides validation?

I'll be glad to hear your advice.

Best regards!

More İsmail Yazıcı's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions