Cite

1 Recommendation

Stam Nicolis

University of Tours

The statements about magnetic monopoles are, simply, wrong, as are the statements about scalar monopole fields.

This is the content of elementary electrodynamics, so it doesn't make sense discussing it here. Just check any textbook on classical electrodynamics. The more recent ones do describe magnetic monopoles, too.

Magnetic monopoles radiate electric and magnetic fields, just like electric monopoles do. The simple reason is they're sources of Maxwell's equations and these equations mix electric and magnetic fields.

One review about magnetic monopoles is here: http://www.theory.caltech.edu/~preskill/pubs/preskill-1984-monopoles.pdf

Cf. also http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/download/v31/v31a36.pdf

that stresses, how to obtain the properties of magnetic monopoles by performing certain quite simple transformations on the fields of electric charges.

It simply makes no sense mixing up electromagnetism with gravity. Gravity isn't mediated by a scalar field, but by tensor field, for starters-this, too, is now standard material in any undergraduate physics course, so there's no point in pretending it's not known. And if it isn't, there's no point in discussing the subject at all, since it doesn't make sense discussing dark energy and gravity, if general relativity hasn't been studied, first. The statements about scalar pressure are, simply, wrong.

Cite

2 Recommendations

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Thank you for your expert opinion

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Dear Readers,

Since tensor is a generalization of scalar and vector... by saying scalar field in the universe it meant the onmidirectional overall averaged scalar vector field thus a tensor field.

I believe i generally described in my hypothesis the physical mechanism by which monopole dark matter magnetism could be converted into dipole ordinary matter magnetism triggered by an electric charge unbalance thus dipole electric field in ordinary matter.

This is not what about the undergraduate textbooks are writing, it is an alternative hypothesis theory and physical explanation of what actually is happening.

Monopole magnetic charges no needed in Maxwell's equations doesn't mean necessarily that they don't exist.

Any specific law statements violated by my hypothesis without general talk and definitions clashing would be nice.

Thank you.

Cite

1 Recommendation

Jose Garrigues

Polytechnic University of Valencia

Stam Nicolis wrote

“It simply makes no sense mixing up electromagnetism with gravity”

Read the article

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/relation-between-the-gravitational-and-magnetic-fields-2090-0902-1000169.pdf

And you will see how the magnetic field and the gravitational field are two different manifestations of the same phenomenon

Cite

1 Recommendation

John Hunter

Independent Researcher

This http://vixra.org/abs/1802.0167 may give a much simpler explanation for the origin of gravity. It has background thinking in Appendix B, and this leads on to show how your diagram showing omega(m)=0.25 can arise.

However, it is only by trying new ideas like yours that progress gets made in physics, so good luck with your research.

Cite

2 Recommendations

Senem Çabuk

Ankara University

The answer to this question is perhaps hidden in the first moments of the universe. If we assume that gravity is the end result of destruction of matter and antimatter, we can say that gravity is formed by the effect of dark energy.

Cite

6 Recommendations

Cesar Zen Vasconcellos

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Dear all

According to our present knowledge about electromagnetism and gravity, Stan Nicolis is right. There's no experimental evidence up to now for the existence of magnetic monopoles. If they exist, we would have to modify Maxwell's equations. Modified Maxwell's equations then indicate that, if magnetic monopole exists, they would radiate electric and magnetic fields, just like electric monopoles do. The simple reason, as said by Stan, is that they would became sources of electric and magnetic fields. It is important to mention a crucial characteristic of EM waves, they are composite of electric E and magnetic B oscilating fields, in such a way that E and B correspond to orthogonal vector fields. This explain the term "mixed" used by Stan. Gravity is described by a tensor field, as Stan mention.

Cite

2 Recommendations

Cesar Zen Vasconcellos

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Dear all

There are many candidates for dark matter. For instance: WIMPs - weakly interacting massive particles, Axions, MACHOs, massive astrophysical compact halo objects, Kaluza-Klein particles, gravitino, the supersymmetric partner of the hypothetical 'graviton', a pleiad of fermionic and bosonic candidates and so on. No effective results up to now. No direct evidence of dark matter.

Cite

2 Recommendations

Cesar Zen Vasconcellos

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Dear Emmanouil Markoulakis

As Stan said, scalar fields have spin 0, electric (and magnetic) fields have spin 1 and gravity is described by a field that has spin 2.

So your statement

"... by saying scalar field in the universe it meant the onmidirectional overall averaged scalar vector field thus a tensor field."

sorry for that, has no meaning. You are making a mixture of concepts, involving a "global" view of the universe with the intrinsic nature of local fields. I do not understand the statement.

Cite

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Dear Professor Cesar Zen Vasconcellos ,

quote:

"

Dear Emmanouil Markoulakis

As Stan said, scalar fields have spin 0, electric (and magnetic) fields have spin 1 and gravity is described by a field that has spin 2."

end quote

A: I think i have to disagree, here, spin 1 of electromagnetic fields refers to ordinary matter and is refering for dipole fields. Monopole magnetic field hiding in dark matter has spin 0 and therefore is a scalar field, its every where. So no point mixing dipole magnetism spin 1 with monopole magnetism spin 0.

______________________________________

Before i continue, an important clarification first:

It is believed that dark matter and ordinary matter does NOT interact through electromagnetism, only by gravity.

But waht I am saying with my hypotheses and theory is that, the truth was in front of our nose all the time... thus electromagnetism IS THE interaction of dark matter with ordinary matter!

_____________________________________________

As soon as dark matter interacts (electromagnetism) with ordinary matter (meaning all the time) monopole dark matter magnetism is ejected by two distinct opposite jets (dipole) , into ordinary matter in the form of spin 1 dipole magnetism forced by the dipole nature of electric fields spin 1 existing in ordinary matter.

So your statement

quote

"... by saying scalar field in the universe it meant the onmidirectional overall averaged scalar vector field thus a tensor field."

sorry for that, has no meaning. You are making a mixture of concepts, involving a "global" view of the universe with the intrinsic nature of local fields. I do not understand the statement."

end quote

A: well... an omnidirectional tensor field is essentially a scalar field.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil Markoulakis

TEI of Crete

Greece

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

In order to someone better understand my dark matter & gravity connection theory he/she must first understand my dark matter - ordinary matter electromagnetism effect theory:

The crux of my EM & dark matter theory

_______________________________________________

Magnetism originates and is generated at a domain wall the only spatial regions in the Universe were electric charge is balanced and E field is zeroed.

Therefore because in any two points in the universe from the macroscale down to the quantum level, the electric charge is unbalanced there is always a midpoint (domain wall) between them, where E=0, this is the exact spatial string where magnetism emanates out of the dark matter domain as a unknown yet magnetic charge particle or its quanta...

Important here to note is because magnetism is ejected out of the midpoint (domain wall) as monopole dark matter radiation of any spatial electric field between two electric charged points is space therefore because this dipole nature of electric fields the monopole megnetism is ejected in two distinct jets each towards each electric charge of the electric dipolar field, thus magnetism experienced in ordinary matter is always dipole in nature.

This is a beautiful theory because it binds electromagnetism with dark matter domain proving that what we call electromagnetism (including unified strong and weak force) is an effect caused by the interaction of ordinary monopole electric charged matter with dark monopole magnetic charged matter everywhere in the universe and in any scale.

Also the stronger the  electric charge unbalance between two spatial regions for example in a dipole magnet, the more the domain wall between these two regions opens up and more magnetic charge emanates from the domain wall out of the dark matter to the ordinary matter thus more electromagnetism.

If the above theory proves theoretical or/and experimental true, and we consequently then get rid of the  "action at a distance" dogma and accept dark matter as the elusive till now medium for energy and information transfer then we have also opened the gates and made the breakthrough for explaining gravity I submit.

Until then gates are closed.

In order to understand gravity we must first master Electromagnetism cause and effect.

The truth of Gravity passes through Electromagnetism...

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Dear Hans van Leunen.

Very interesting process you describe. I always wondered if universe had to coordinate all together would light speed be sufficient?

Is the process you describe taking place everywhere instanteneously and if not what kind of superluminal response time would be needed?

Also the position presented by some individuals here in this thread that you can not combine electromagnetism with gravity and that they are totaly two different things, is agnaist unification theory and not mainstream.

EM

Cite

1 Recommendation

Cesar Zen Vasconcellos

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Dear Emmanouil

Magnetic monopoles if they exist they would have a scalar magnetic charge; and they would not generate spin zero magnetic fields. As electric monopoles. They have a scalar electric charge, and they do not generate a scalar electric field. See Maxwell's equations.

Cite

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Dear Cesar,

Elementary spin 0 scalar particles which are bosons meaning force carriers has been proven experimetally to exist namely the Higgs boson.

Since the magnetic charge particle has been not found experimentally we can only theorize about its nature.

Cite

1 Recommendation

Cesar Zen Vasconcellos

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Hi, yes, but fields are different entities than charges and now you are talking about quantum statistics of elementary particles. In the beginning you was talking i presume about magnetic monopolar charges and some kind of modified version of the classical equations of EM (Maxwell equations)... A magnetic monopolar charge criates a flux of a vector magnetic field if it exists. (according to the integral form of the modified Gauss law for magnetic fields). Or creates the divergence of a vector magnetic field. (according to the differential form of a modified Gauss law).

Of course you can speculate on this level of knowledge we have on this topic.

Cite

1 Recommendation

Cesar Zen Vasconcellos

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Well nobody will "see" the Higgs to add mass to any particle... mass results from breaking of chiral symmetry in quantum field theory and is correlated to the standard model for particles. The Higgs boson corresponds to a "missing" component of the standard model.

Cite

2 Recommendations

Cesar Zen Vasconcellos

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Hi

The Higgs boson was proposed within the Standard Model. It represents a particle manifestation or matter realization of the so called Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism. This mechanism help us to understand the origin of mass. Other types of Higgs bosons are predicted by other theories.

Cite

2 Recommendations

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

I find it strange how the mass property can explained by using another particle namely the Higgs, which has mass?!!

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

In my model mass is analogue to the pressure mediation ratio in a specified space volume of local scalar electric monopole charge and scalar magnetic monopole charge.

Electric monolpole charge is an exclusive property of ordinary matter whereas monopole magnetig charge an exclusive property of dark matter.

Cite

1 Recommendation

Cesar Zen Vasconcellos

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Hi

I understand your concern. But see, the quantum of the EM field, for example, the photon, it has no (rest) mass. On the other hand the quantum of the Higgs field, the Higgs boson, has mass. So, if an electric charged particle absorbs a photon it does not change its original mass. If a zero mass particle absorbs a Higgs boson it becomes massive (in the sense of rest mass). But again I understand your concern. Should think on this mechanism as the simplest and "natural" way for modeling the origin of mass. I tell you way. One of the most important symmetries in nature is the chiral symmetry. And according to this symmetry all particles should have zero rest mass. However we observe massive particles in nature. So, this fact lead the scientists to try to understand what kind of mechanism breaks chiral symmetry. The Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism is presently accepted as the key mechanism for explaining the breaking of chiral symmetry. But you know science... who knows the future directions of this topic of research...

Cite

2 Recommendations

Sergey Shevchenko

Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

“…So, if an electric charged particle absorbs a photon it does not change its original mass…”

particles, including charged ones, cannot absorb photons, they can scatter photons only. The absorption is possible only for systems of particles [if we, of course, don’t consider inelastic scattering on a particle of extremely high energy photons, when simply new particles are created]; for example, when a photon with energy E is absorbed with excitation of a state of an electron in an atom’s electronic shell. And the excited atom’s rest mass becomes larger on the Δm=E/c2.

“…One of the most important symmetries in nature is the chiral symmetry. And according to this symmetry all particles should have zero rest mass…”

there is nothing mystic in the “rest mass”, every particle, including photons, have both, inertial and gravitational masses; though particles are of two main types:

“T articles”, that are created by the zero [“coordinate time” dimension of the Matter’s absolute [5]4D Euclidian spacetime] component of 4D momentums, and so they always move along this temporal dimensions, however, if are impacted by a spatial momentum, can move [and mostly move] in space also; and

“S-particles”, that are created by the spatial components of 4D momentums, and so they always move only in space, the utmost known example S-particles are photons.

Since all particles are some close-loop algorithms, that reveals at interactions as that they are some 4D gyroscopes, and so resist to attempts to change their 4D rotation rate vectors; what reveals as the ”inertia”, the measure of the inertia is the inertial mass.

Again, since all, T- and S-particles, are gyroscopes, all particles have inertia and have inertial masses.

Correspondingly for existence of inertial mass there is no any necessity in existence of some “Higgs field”, and that doesn’t depend on some “chiral symmetry”.

The unique difference in this case between T-particles and S-particles is that T-particles can be at rest in the 3D space, however, since they move in this case along the zero axis with the speed of light, they resist to spatial [which mostly take part at interactions] momentums that force particles to move also in the space with different spatial accelerations and speeds; when if a spatial momentum impacts on a S-particle, let, on a photon, since in Matter all/every particle moves with 4D speed of light, a photon, which moves with spatial speed of light already, cannot be accelerated at spatial impact, and so the result of the impact is that the photon’s energy/frequency becomes be changed.

That’s all.

Returning to thread’s question, it seems that to suggest that some “dark energy” causes the gravity there is too small grounds; for example humans don’t observe some “dark energy” effects in Sun planet system, or even in Milky Way, when the gravitational interactions that form the planets, stars, galaxies, are well observable.

Much more reasonable is the suggestion that Gravity is the 4-th fundamental Nature force, which in many traits is like the other fundamental Nature force, EM force, i.e. has the charge “gravitational mass” and mediators, gravitons, that are similar to electric charge and photons.

More about gravity see SS posts in https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_the_gravitational_wave_detection_is_real?view=5ada00d135e538566e5c6aaf

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_are_scientists_trying_to_merge_gravity_and_quantum_physics_even_though_gravity_is_just_the_curvature_of_space-time?view=5ada1ff0615e278e3c69105e

and papers that are linked in these posts.

Cheers

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Wonderful very expert presentation Sergey,

I think we agree in one point. Gravity is not originating from the Euclidean space.

Cite

Jose Garrigues

Polytechnic University of Valencia

gravity is an effect of the expansion of the universe. you apply the expansion to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and you get the gravitational force

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

and what causing this expansion? let's talk about physical phenomena cause and effect and try to see the underlying mechanism and less about maths which just describing the effects and not the cause.

I think we are getting lost in the description and loosing the essence.

Cite

1 Recommendation

Jose Garrigues

Polytechnic University of Valencia

In the time of Planck, we have the strength of Planck. then it is enough to multiply by the speed of light to have the energy of Planck. Suppose that there is a quantum energy fluctuation E t = h / 4π. that fluctuation physically is a rotation in space and in the fourth dimension. the rotation is transmitted to the adjacent 4D space atoms. that produces the expansion and at the same time a decrease of the gravitational potential energy in the fourth dimension. to compensate for this loss of energy, a new quantum fluctuation occurs. and so on. This allows us to explain the quantum phenomena, the relativistic phenomena, to deduce the equations that are used, to calculate the fundamental constants, etc. etc. etc. and I do not need virtual particles, like photons, gravitons, etc etc etc

Cite

1 Recommendation

Jose Garrigues

Polytechnic University of Valencia

Dear Emmanouil.

Read chapter 3

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315837723_Classic_4D_Model_Of_the_Discrete_Universe_C1C2_and_C3

Cite

1 Recommendation

Sergey Shevchenko

Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Emmanouil,

“…I think we agree in one point. Gravity is not originating from the Euclidean space…”

yeah, any space is nothing more then some empty container, which have the number of dimensions that are necessary to place in it some “multidimensional” information, for a human’s text usually is enough two-dimensional paper sheet or a computer’s monitor’s screen.

To place the informational system “Matter” is necessary 3D empty spatial container.

For a system could change, to the spatial dimensions is necessary to add some temporal dimensions, and for dynamical objects/systems thus the container is a “spacetime”.

By some reasons for dynamical system “Matter” two “times” – the “true time” [which is necessary for any changing system, that is absolutely fundamental and universal time], and the “coordinate time” are necessary; thus Matter’s spacetime is [5]4D Euclidian empty container, when anything inside the container evidently cannot impact on the emptiness, and even more evident the emptiness cannot impact on something inside, including the real physical force “Gravity” cannot be originated from the emptiness – as that is postulated in the relativity theories.

As to

“…and what causing this expansion? let's talk about physical phenomena cause and effect and try to see the underlying mechanism…”

there is no any “physical mechanism” to explain the possible “space [spacetime?] expansion”, starting from the much more evident expansion – that was at Beginning of Matter creation. In spite of that there are rather numerous of “savants”, which assert that Matter appeared at some “energy fluctuation” of some “physical vacuum point”, that is evident fantasy: the probability of “energy fluctuation”, when from nothing the energy 1090 J was released, is extremely near zero, even if we don’t take attention on such evidently totally mystic notion as “physical vacuum”.

And, moreover, to claim, that as the result of some unbelievably uncertain “fluctuation” the very rigorously logically organized system “Matter” appeared, seems is necessary to have some hyperability to produce some fantasies.

So the probability of version that our Universe, including “Matter” was created by some very mighty Creator, seems as much greater then the probability of the “scientific” versions above.

How that could be at Beginning – see https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260930711_the_Information_as_Absolute , at least Sec. 6.1.3. “The problem of Beginning and evolution of Universe”.

Correspondingly seems as rather probable that for the possible “expansion problem” we have no any physical grounds also, because of all what is accessible at measuring of physical parameters, and the parameters, correspondingly, themselves, don’t relate to really applied “mechanisms” of the expansion; when, for example, if the expansion indeed exists, it can be possible that Baby simply rises till now…

Cheers

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Thank you Sergey,

and also for the links you provide I will study them.

I like specially the part were you proof that universe is a creation process which evolved:

"So the probability of version that our Universe, including “Matter” was created by some very mighty Creator, seems "as much greater then the probability of the “scientific” versions above. "

However, GOD created along with light matter also dark matter. The interaction of these two are causing all the effects we know thus electromagnetism and gravity.

And don't tell me we can not see or it is not enough to explain this and that...that's frankly BS! you don't know what it is in the first place.

Emmanouil

Cite

Sergey Shevchenko

Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Emmanouil,

“…I like specially the part were you proof that universe is a creation process which evolved…”

in the SS post above there is no proof of a creation process, this process is external to the human’s consciousness. At that the consciousness fundamentally can prove something only in cases, when this something is her purely abstract product, when she herself establishes some objects, rules for relations between the objects and some initial conditions; mostly that happens in mathematics.

But any inference about something in the External for humans is based on some experimental information about this something only, when any experimental information fundamentally cannot be a base/ground for a proof.

From that is unique exclusion – the Shevchenko and Tokarevsky’s philosophical conception “The Information as Absolute” [the link see above], where indeed it is rigorously proven that all/everything what exist is/are some informational patterns/systems of the patterns that are elements of the absolutely fundamental and absolutely infinite “Information” Set, and this proof is possible only because of the notion/phenomenon “Information” is absolutely fundamental. To understand more in this case is necessary to read the linked above paper as a whole.

Including any God is some informational system also; i.e. It isn't absolutely fundamental and Its existence cannot be proven.

“…However, GOD created along with light matter also dark matter…”

the words “light” and “dark” matters are some jargon notions, more correctly the system “Matter” consists of “visible” matter, i.e. matter that interact with light/photons [including dark “visible” objects that absorb the light] Though that is not totally correct also, in Matter 4 fundamental Nature force act, including in this case some objects are “visible” not at interactions with photons, but at interactions with two other [the strong and the weak] forces. Possibly existent “dark matter” isn’t visible in all these 3 forces, since the corresponding particles interact only gravitationally.

What can be these “dark matter” particles – see Sec. 3.3 Planck mass particles in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273777630_The_Informational_Conception_and_Basic_Physics

Thus how Matter and Matter’s spacetime possibly could be created at Beginning, you possibly new already knew, if has read the link in the SS post above; at that possible Creator with a very non-zero probability could only establish the “physical” properties of the future material objects, assigning them to the fundamental logical elements (FLE), which appeared as the result of exponential dividing, and pumped in the appeared system, i.e. the dense lattice of the FLE, “Ether”, a huge energy, when some FLEs of the Ether start move and interact, i.e. these disturbances of Ether became be some particles.

At that it seems rather reasonable to suggest, that at this Creator’s impact only primary “dark matter” particles appeared, for example – Planck mass particles, which so all were the “particles” only, and so Matter at Beginning and further always consisted/consists without antimatter.

This process practically for sure proceeded without any influence of Creator – all happened at Beginning and happens in Matter now “automatically”; after the laws and links were established in the FLEs, nothing non-desirable for Creator could happen, there could appear randomly any Matter version, however all versions would be practically identical to our Matter, differing, for example, on a few galaxies, etc.

It could be useful to read, the relevant to some extent to this thread, thread https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_does_the_dark_matter_not_aggregate_and_blend_with_normal_matter?view=5ad8c86f6a21ff32df4a17f0

“….that's frankly BS!…”

sorry English isn’t my native language and I don’t understand – what is “BS”.

Cheers

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

he heh! BS means Bullsh*t!

Cite

total bullshit

Cite

Salvatore Vicidomini

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca

Hi All.

A key question in modern physics & astrophysics now is a complete theory for gravity; the following question is possibly related >>>

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Black_Holes_out_of_a_galaxy_do_they_exist

Thanks.

--s.v.--

Cite

1 Recommendation

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Dear All,

The omnipresent aether medium is coming back in science today with new proof of concept experiments and and as an alternative theory to the Copenhagen interpretation fallacy: The theory now contradicting the establishment and gaining ground over time is an old theory namely the the pilot wave theory:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIyTZDHuarQ (pilot wave theory)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZPVp0NGEYY (Nassim Haramein explaining)

http://dualwalkers.com/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_wave_theory. (biased view) Elementary particles and quanta of energy are all manifestations of these same omnipresent medium (aerher), in the form of vibrations, condensations, waves, and in general distortions of this aether universal dark (i.e. we can not detect it yet but only can see the effects of interaction with it like EM SNF WNF and Gravity).

Emmanouil Markoulakis

TEI of Crete

• Capture

  2.PNG

  232 kB

Cite

László Attila Horváth

-

Dear Emmanouil Markoulakis,

I think, we with the co-author, have luck to create very simple model about gravity which are tested well by real phenomena…

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327201504_Gravity_a_paradym_shift_in_reasoning

Only one think the theory have been developed more, no needs dark energy.

Regards, Laszlo

P.S.

Any critics are welcome!

Cite

The even distribution means that dark energy does not have any local gravitational effects, but rather a global effect on the universe as a whole. This leads to a repulsive force, which tends to accelerate the expansion of the universe.

Cite

Similar questions and discussions

Why is a Magnet a Dark Matter Machine?

Question

42 answers

• Asked 24 February 2018

• Emmanouil Markoulakis

Why Magnets Are Dark Matter Machines - A hypothesis

I have developed an hypothesis on how magnets work but this time I dare to differ from mainstream science. So I am going to be a kind of heretic here, excuse me. Don't ask me for a proof since this is just an hypothesis.

I’ve been thinking about a theory opposing current mainstream beliefs, on how a magnetic field actually emanates from the Bloch Wall region of a magnet outward.

It makes more sense to me than the Bloch wall being the result in the difference of complimentary pairs.

The field has to begin somewhere.

Magnet photo

https://tinyurl.com/yav8ly5b

Block Wall Domain region photo of magnet when viewed with a magnetic viewer (with dark green the two poles of the magnet left and right and the light green line in the middle the Bloch domain wall of the magnet):

https://tinyurl.com/ybssr37f

If you think about it, magnets have their magnetic domains inside their mass turned unidirectional (pointing to the same direction).

So ask yourself how an isotropic event can produce an anisotropic complementary outcome phenomenon namely the two magnetic poles of the dipole magnet? 

Between where lies the unbalance here which will produce the magnet?

The answer I submit is between the normal matter of the magnet and the dark matter which occupies the same space where the physical magnet is.

The combined coulomb charge of the magnet domains facing to the same direction produces an unbalance between the normal matter of the magnet and the dark matter field which manifests a disturbance of the else at rest, dark matter unipolar magnetic field.

This disturbance ripple of the dark matter magnetic field is then emanating from the magnet's Bloch wall region outwards. 

The focal point of the disturbance is on the Bloch domain wall region (or line) of the magnet, there where the node of the disturbed  dark matter field lies upon at the center of the normal mass of the magnet. 

I bet, that in a non-uniform mass distributed magnet, where the center of mass of the magnet is not at its geometrical center, the Bloch line will be shifted to where the the center of mass of the magnet is located in space.

So it's  like throwing a little stone at the calm surface of a pond. You can't see the disturbance waves exactly at the point of impact  (the node is located there).

Also the disturbance will remain as long the coulomb electric charge, responsible for the normal matter  - dark matter imbalance caused, remains inside the magnet.

So then why we don't see magnetic poles forming all around a magnet physical object?

My intuition says, because dark matter is organized in parallel one dimensional strings. It is like guitar chords. Not crossing each other.

Dark matter is the fabric of space itself. No dark matter, no space [1]. These are the pixels of our universe and they must be therefore directly correlated with Planck length.

As a final note, if you want to find dark matter don't look further than the Bloch domain wall of a magnet.

Emmanouil Markoulakis

TEI of Crete

project page: https://www.researchgate.net/project/A-Synthetic-Magnetic-Unipolar-Array-Not-a-Dirac-Monopole

References:

Article Dark Matter: The Source of Space and Time

View

The omnipresent aether medium is coming back in science today

Discussion

26 replies

• Asked 14 September 2018

• Emmanouil Markoulakis

Dear All,

The omnipresent aether medium is coming back in science today with new proof of concept experiments and and as an alternative theory to the Copenhagen interpretation fallacy. The theory now contradicting the establishment and gaining ground over time is an old theory namely the the pilot wave theory:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIyTZDHuarQ (pilot wave theory)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZPVp0NGEYY (Nassim Haramein explaining)

http://dualwalkers.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_wave_theory. (biased view)

Elementary particles and quanta of energy are all manifestations of these same omnipresent medium (aerher), in the form of vibrations, condensations, waves, and in general distortions of this aether universal dark (i.e. we can not detect it yet but only can see the effects of interaction with it like EM SNF WNF and Gravity).

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Technological Educational Institute of Crete

View

Is De-Broglie Bohm (pilot wave) Theory gaining ground today over the Copenhagen Interpretation?

Question

422 answers

• Asked 14 September 2018

• Emmanouil Markoulakis

Dear All,

The omnipresent aether medium is coming back in science today with new proof of concept experiments and as an alternative theory to the Copenhagen interpretation fallacy: The theory now contradicting the establishment and gaining ground over time is an old theory namely the the pilot wave theory:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIyTZDHuarQ (pilot wave theory)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZPVp0NGEYY (Nassim Haramein explaining)

http://dualwalkers.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_wave_theory. (biased view)

Elementary particles and quanta of energy are all manifestations of this same omnipresent medium (aerher), in the form of vibrations, condensations, waves, vortices and in general distortions of this aether universal dark (i.e. we can not detect it yet but only can see the effects of interaction with it like EM SNF WNF and Gravity).

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Technological Educational Institute of Crete

View

Superluminal Multiphased Spacetime Theory (MPST)

Discussion

21 replies

• Asked 29 August 2019

• Emmanouil Markoulakis

A New Theory idea and co authorship invitation : Superluminal Multiphased Spacetime Theory (MPST). Your comments and discussion here is most welcome.

Preprint The superluminal Vacuum Energy Timespace Domain Model and ho...

Project: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Superluminal-Multiphased-Spacetime-Theory-MPST-2

Dear All,

Currently this is an highly hypothetical cosmological-quantum model and although an amazing plausible scenario, superluminal physics have not been yet invented and therefore hard to present it as a scientific argument today.

Therefore I find it unsuitable to integrate it to any scientific theory at this time and represents only my personal scientific intuition and logical conclusion but nevertheless unable to prove it by scientific hard data and means.

I don't publish in peer reviewed Journals without having any bit of experimental physical evidence or at least strong theoretical proof.

Nevertheless the idea is copyrighted by me in RG and If anyone can work out theoretically with me that a superluminal energy state can exist under specific conditions without violating the modern established theories (or maybe circumventing them) then please do contact me and I will be more than happy to co author what will be to most exciting and breakthrough cosmological theory of the last 20 years and probably one of the most important and fundamental of this century.

The acknowledgement of the existence of superluminal energy and the Multiphased Spacetime (MPST) Theory © will be I believe an important step and mile stone in our civilization evolution.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Research Fellow/ PhD Candidate

Hellenic Mediterranean University

Former Technological Educational Institute of Crete

[email protected]

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-2621

29th August 2019.

copyright©Emm Markoulakis HMU 2019

View

Magnetism is dark matter radiation?

Question

15 answers

• Asked 9 March 2018

• Emmanouil Markoulakis

I believe that the phenomenon we call magnetism, field part of the overall electromagnetism phenomenon and thus the until now elusive magnetic subatomic Dirac monopole charge particle, can not be found because it is hiding in dark matter out of sight and our grasp.

Is the magnetic charge particle a dark matter particle?

View

The one question science can not answer: What is the magnetic field made up of?

Question

644 answers

• Asked 12 October 2018

• Emmanouil Markoulakis

Dear All,

What particle is streaming inside the magnetic field lines?

or else what is the gauge Boson force carrier particle constituting a magnetic field?

And by that I mean a static magnetic field in free space (i.e. vacuum).

I really want to know what the magnetic field is made up of? Please do not use photons or virtual photons in your answer as we all know magnetic fields are not composed of photons.

This question was never really answered. I am not asking about the electromagnetic field which is most closely associated with the photon. All answers provided from the literature were incomplete and not relevant to my question.

What is the magnetic field made up of? Here is what modern day science actually knows about Magnetic fields. The honest answer is we do not know what a magnetic field is.

What we do know is that a Magnet field is generated by the motion of electrostatic charges within the the magnet itself. The electric charges being electrons. The electrons move in a coherent and synchronized fashion which causes a strong magnetic field to be projected out from the magnet. What we do not know is what that field is made up of.

It is my opinion that a magnetic field is not made up of any known particle field at all. I think of a magnetic field as being a direct deformation of physical space. All pure fields must work this way. They must be mechanical deformations of space. You can think of space being a low density, high tension solid elastic. The magnetic field is a mechanical deformation of space itself.

Of course the above notion directly implies that there is no such a thing like empty space and the existence of an omnipresent scalar medium. Aether? Dark energy? Vacuum energy? Magnetic Monopoles? unknown neutrinos?

This question begs for an answer and may as well be the key for freeing our self and deciphering the rest 96% of unknown matter and radiation in our Universe.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil

View

A Possible Solution to the Vacuum Catastrophe Unsolved Physics Problem?

Question

6 answers

• Asked 16 April 2019

• Emmanouil Markoulakis

Solution:

Preprint A Possible Solution to the Vacuum Catastrophe Unsolved Physics Problem

Any thoughts?

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Technological Educational Institute of Crete

View

Are Black holes galactic giant sized magnetic dipoles (magnets)?

Question

47 answers

• Asked 17 December 2018

• Emmanouil Markoulakis

Dear All,

"Wondering where the Event Horizon Telescope is at with the world's first photo of a black hole? So are we. We headed back to MIT Haystack Observatory to find out":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fFL9oLNJOI

A paper will be published mid-2019 with actual observations, photos, for the first time we will see with our eyes a Black hole, and scientific conclusions.

Nevertheless, I can't help it to notice the striking resemblance of this galactic gravitational phenomena extravaganza with the quantum magnetic field (QFM) shown by a ferrolens of humble normal dipole magnets (i.e. N-S poles)!...

Fig.1 shows an illustration of what science believes today a black hole should look like.

Fig. 2 is a more detailed close up photo of the black hole illustration, showing its accretion disk flow and also its two polar flows up and down of the spherical black hole body. Taken from the above video link at this time stamp:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fFL9oLNJOI&t=30s

Now please combare this above photos and video with the photos and video taken from our research team here in the Technological Educational Institute of Crete, ComputerTechnology, Informatics & Electronic Devices Laboratory, Romanou 3, Chania, 73133, Greece,

using a quantum ferrolens magneto optic device showing the field of dipole macro magnets N-S poles, up and down part of the photos and video.

Fig. 3 Quantum filed of a Neodymium sphere magnet. Accretion disk of magnetic field as well the two polar fields are shown N-S poles, up and down directions in the photo.

Fig.4 The same as fig. 3 but this time the field of a cylindrical magnet is show.

Fig. 5 The quantum field of a diametrical magnetized ring magnetic array. Half of the ring magnet perimeter is a North pole (up) and other half (down) is a South pole.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWQ-n4HqtRo&feature=youtu.be

update 11 April 2019:

Historic: The first Photograph of a Black Hole Release today 11th of April 2019 by the Event Horizon Telescope

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omz77qrDjsU (Theatrical Version)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RxitCeuokI (short version Nature)

... A Vortex Ring

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil Markoulakis

Technological Educational Institute of Crete

References

Do Black Holes appear black because not even light can escape their gravitational pull? :

Preprint Do Black Holes appear black because not even light can escap...

ScienceDirect: https://tinyurl.com/y7juoqnw

RG:

Article The Quantum Field Of A Magnet Shown By A Nanomagnetic Ferrolens

Arxiv: https://tinyurl.com/yb9bu7jk

View

Related Publications

De la relatividad al universo y la física cuántica. Un ensayo de divulgación. (Spanish)

Preprint

Full-text available

• Dec 2024

• Francisco Bernis
• En

This article provides in a plain language, with very few mathematical formulas, an overview of theoretical physics from the second half of nineteenth century to the present days. It covers Galilei and Einstein's principles of relativity, Maxwell's electromagnetic theory, special and general relativity, quantum mechanics and quantum field theory and...

View

In Ferent Quantum Gravity, Dark Matter gives mass to electrons and the Higgs field does not exist

Article

Full-text available

• Jul 2020

• Adrian Ferent

“In Ferent Quantum Gravity, Dark Matter gives mass to electrons and the Higgs field does not exist” Adrian Ferent “The Ferent mechanism: the interaction energy of gravitons emitted by Dark Matter gives mass to the elementary particles” Adrian Ferent “Because the elementary particles contain Dark Matter with the mass much smaller than particles ma...

View

Differential Geometrical Methods in Theoretical Physics

Book

• Jan 1988

• K. Bleuler
• M. Werner

View

Got a technical question?

Get high-quality answers from experts.

Ask a question

Join ResearchGate to find the people and research you need to help your work

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

or

Discover by subject area

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• LoginEmail Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login

  PasswordForgot password?

  Keep me logged in

  Log in

  or

  Continue with Google

  Welcome back! Please log in.

  Email · HintTip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login

  PasswordForgot password?

  Keep me logged in

  Log in

  or

  Continue with Google

  No account? Sign up