The research ‘field’ of Digital health is dedicated to realising digital technologies’ potential and developing knowledge about their feasibility and impacts. With the introduction of several new journals (such as Sage Digital Health, The Lancet Digital Health and Frontiers in Digital Health), Digital health is in many ways an emerging field.

Yet, drawing on a critical review of the articles in the most prominent multidisciplinary digital health journals in our article Article A critical review of the role of technology and context in d...

, we show that the digital health field has not profoundly engaged with its core subject, namely technology. The features of digital technologies remain in the background, and research is disconnected from the complexities of healthcare settings, including multiple technologies, established practices and people. Instead, the overarching focus in the Digital Health literature is the processing capabilities of digital technologies and their posited impacts. The technologies are treated as black boxes and the context of the lab seems to be considered similar to the context of use (care, planning, coordination etc).

I would argue that if we do not take this issue seriously, the potential of the Digital Health field will be limited and eventually a dead end.

How can we develop Digital Health into a field where technology and the context of use take a more prominent role?

More Petter Nielsen's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions