Two ways to deal with climate change are mitigating it by reducing emissions, and/or adapting to the climate change we cannot avoid.

I have always believed that adaptation is 'harder' than mitigation in the sense that adaptation is much more locally specific and therefore cannot always be translated easily to other areas. I believe it is easier to build a wind turbines in the Netherlands and using the same technology in Italy, than to irrigate tomatoes in the Netherlands and to use this technology in Italy. The irrigation technology must be adjusted with regard to water availability, water requirements (which highly depend on the climate), the soil where the crop is cultivated, shadow on the field...

Indeed, there are difference in wind turbines (for instance off-shore mills). But in general, is it true that adaptation is more difficult to upscale than mitigation?

Similar questions and discussions