Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2016. Perfect Green Markets vrs Dwarf Green Markets: Did We Start Trying to Solve the Environmental Crisis in 2012 With the Wrong Green Foot? If Yes, How Can This Situation Be Corrected? In: International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Research (IJAEMR), Vol.1, Issue 6, Pp 389-406, August, India.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305994500_Perfect_Green_Markets_vrs_Dwarf_Green_Markets_Did_We_Start_Trying_to_Solve_the_Environmental_Crisis_in_2012_With_the_Wrong_Green_Foot_If_Yes_How_Can_This_Situation_Be_Corrected
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305067067_Perfect_Green_Markets_vrs_Dwarf_Green_Markets_Did_We_Start_Trying_to_Solve_the_Environmental_Crisis_in_2012_With_the_Wrong_Green_Foot_If_Yes_How_Can_This_Situation_Be_Corrected
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310448223_Perfect_Green_Markets_vrs_Dwarf_Green_Markets_Did_We_Start_Trying_to_Solve_the_Environmental_Crisis_in_2012_With_the_Wrong_Green_Foot_If_Yes_How_Can_This_Situation_Be_Corrected
Not really, But the information may form a background for future analysis
Good day Samira, thank you for taking the time to write.
If you read the article can you please articulate why you think that "No really" we started with the wrong foot....Keep in mind by 2012 and hence by the time I wrote that article(2016) to remind the academic community that they were promoting then THE WRONG GREEN FOOT there were two options: a) fixing the problem or b) managing the problem.
If we do not fix a problem, and chose to manage it and the management addresses some of the consequences of no fixing the problem and the other unaddressed consequences keep accumulating through time you will find in a situation that a worse problem develops in front of your eyes while you are taking action with the wrong foot.
I am curious to know what is your rational for thinking "No really". Please, share it so we can exchange ideas in a positive environment. I am not here to impose my ideas, but to share ideas to stimulate the growth of accepted scientific knowledge
Respectfully yours;
I have no quarrel with your study as i stated it can form a background for future analysis. But were I am from quoting any study from more than 5 years ago would put me in the red. Its why i said not really.
Though interventions that may work in your country may not actually work in my environment. Global policies on sustainable environment does not seem to be making any progress in my country.
So for my environment other innovative interventions may be more productive
My apologies Samira, my request " I am curious to know what is your rational for thinking "No really" was made in good faith, not as a criticism, as I appreciate you took the time to comment....
If your comment is about the actual ideas in the paper, then "No really" does not fit as it is a fact that because the whole world avoided in 2012 to actually go green markets to address head on the environmental crisis, the science based choice the UNCSD 2012 indicated it was going to go then, and publications by UN such as "A blue print for the green economy" were advance then to support that global transition, but in the end they went the way of externality management like for example environmental externality management markets, which every country has one way or another.
Your reply make it clear to me that your reply "Not really" is not related to the actual content of the paper, but realities on the ground, which are relevant and I respect.
My apologies if I made you feel uncomfortable with my request to expand your view and thank you for replying.
Let's leave it here then Samira.
And again, thank you for taking the time to write.
Respectfully yours;
Lucio
- Badges
- Science topic