Note: This is a sensitive discussion. Please refrain from mentioning any PhD candidates, scholars, or professors by name. If you still wish to bring a sensitive matter to my attention, feel free to message me privately.

Reading Material for the Discussion:

Singha, R., & Singha, S. (2024). Be mindful about the inconsistencies in PhD publication requirements: A violation of the principle of natural justice in many institutions. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4974220

Discussion:

The principle of natural justice embodies fairness, equality, and the right to be treated without discrimination. In academic contexts, particularly in the pursuit of a PhD, the application of this principle is crucial to ensure that all candidates are provided with equal opportunities and are held to the same standards. However, the varying publication requirements for PhD completion in different institutions or even within the same institution raise serious concerns regarding the adherence to this principle.

For instance, if one PhD candidate is allowed to complete their degree with no publications, another is required to have one publication, and yet another is asked for two or three publications, it creates a discrepancy that undermines the fairness of the process. Such inconsistency can lead to feelings of discrimination and inequality, where candidates perceive their academic journey as being influenced by arbitrary or subjective criteria rather than merit and academic performance.

From a legal and ethical standpoint, these disparities in publication requirements violate the principle of audi alteram partem (the right to be heard) and nemo judex in causa sua (no one should be a judge in their own case). Candidates may feel that decisions regarding their publication requirements are made without proper justification or consideration of their individual circumstances, leading to potential biases. Furthermore, the lack of a standardized policy across institutions exacerbates this issue, as PhD candidates may be evaluated on uneven grounds, which could impact their academic careers and future opportunities.

To rectify this situation, universities should implement clear, transparent, and consistent publication requirements for all PhD candidates. These standards should be based on academic merit and the field of study, ensuring that every candidate is assessed fairly and equally. Additionally, communication with candidates about these requirements must be transparent, allowing for appeals or discussions in cases where candidates feel unjustly treated.

In conclusion, unequal publication requirements for PhD completion do violate the principle of natural justice. It is imperative that academic institutions address these disparities to promote fairness, equality, and integrity in the academic process. Without such reforms, the credibility of the PhD process may be compromised, leading to long-term consequences for both individual scholars and the academic community as a whole.

Reading Material for the Discussion:

Singha, R., & Singha, S. (2024). Be mindful about the inconsistencies in PhD publication requirements: A violation of the principle of natural justice in many institutions. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4974220

Note: If you are unable to discuss this matter publicly, particularly regarding university policies related to PhDs or other topics, please feel free to message me privately. I assure you that your university and identity will remain confidential. This discussion is intended for publication purposes, and no names or identifying information will be disclosed; our conversation will stay in my inbox, accessible only to me.

This discussion aims to collect data to gain insight into the current situation in India and around the world. The goal is to advocate for reforms in university policies across India and globally for the benefit of future scholars. This conversation is rooted in the principles of democracy and freedom of expression as outlined in the Constitution.

Please share your thoughts publicly; if that's not feasible, I welcome private messages. Your insights and experiences can significantly contribute to meaningful policy reforms that will benefit future generations. We need real-time data to keep our publication updated.

We hope that through your sharing of real-time data, we can inspire significant reforms in policy both in India and globally. This collective effort can lead to increased research and development aimed at the welfare of all humanity, as well as the well-being of all living and non-living entities. Your contributions are essential in shaping a future where policies align with societal and environmental needs, fostering a more sustainable and equitable world for generations to come. Together, we can drive positive change that benefits everyone.