Many forest conservation goals (not to mention cultural, landscape, hydrological & urban shade goals) rely on a continual presence of big, old trees. Part of our sustainable stewardship responsibilities must surely be to begin growing the big, old trees of the future. Most exercises in predicting impacts of climate change don't go past 2100 - because that's the limit of the climate forecast data. But our objective requires trees to live and grow for several centuries - well into the 'dark zone' beyond 2100. What should be our logical response to having to make decisions now in the context of such uncertainty? Carry on as usual with the historically native tree species? Adjust genetic origins or management practices? Try lots of different combinations to avoid 'putting all our eggs in one basket'?

More Duncan Stone's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions