Dear Thierry,

You are missing the point here.

This is not a demonstration experiment about conservation of momentum but a paradigm analogue of how our reality and space Universe (surface and up in the video) could be created by another underlying unknown space and dimensions and at the same time our Universe and everything what is in there, being part of this other reality or medium without us being aware or in any way be possible to find.

After all we are prisoners inside our 4 dimensions.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil

You can have a correct method but a wrong concept and way of thinking leading you to the false path and to a dead end.

The first step is the most important. Maybe we have to go back and get this first step, but this time to the right direction?

Emmanouil is quite on dot about ".... You can have a correct method but a wrong concept and way of thinking leading you to the false path and to a dead end.

The first step is the most important. Maybe we have to go back and get this first step, but this time to the right direction?......."

We will have to go to basic board & correct many of the misconceptions. Original scientists who have developed based on to have something started on & then to have improvement with better hypothesis & logical processes founded on the scientific method that even 5th graders are learning these times, however, I have great doubt as to whether every scientist follows them. Perhaps, resorting to short cut & large number of publications to overwhelmingly establish their authorities rather than quality fewer publications have become norm of these times. Hence there is a plethora of publications having quality essence only a few percentages even that are published at Phys. Rev. ones.

Recently it has been quite refreshing to have scientists like Emmanouil who have tenacity to question like Popper had earlier about falsifiability principle, for example. May be many of the modern day scientists, or so they declare themselves to be with just quantity of publications, might all go to schools of philosophy to reteach themselves these correct concepts & evaluate papers with original contents reviewing them properly not merely scan through them.

Working with well known Professor I had a chance reviewing papers, text book style, reading every sentence & between the lines to examine credibility & originality. It is something like "Pilgrim's Progress" to get correct perspective. A meaningless excited bile or nervous rush, although may good temporarily will not be helpful to the masses as a long term solution to a complex problem.

I can suggest a logical technique that will be good to start with evaluating on line by line or sentence by sentence - false/not_true/not_false/true & they keep only that are true/not-false statements or arguments or logicality or equations, hypothesis, observations, even evaluations, among other aspects. If we are able to develop logical IT technique processing that will be a good starter to move in the right way. I have a reading machine like "the demon machine" that Maxwell applied to get truth of the matter. Note that the true/not_false will automatically require proof theoretically & experimentally using proper scientific methodology and/or technique to establish paradigm properly.

Scientific community will have reawaken itself to the enlightenment which is highly now past due. Last 25 years my effort has to get logical thinking correct, after seeing what I have described above. I feel quite relieved to work with scientists like original thinker Emmanouil to set right course of science through grounding proper philosophy becoming a part of solution and not a part of the problem.

Thank you with all in these forums who have expressed such concerns & are striving toward our proper goals/future of earth beseeches us all!!!!! As an educator I am striving towards that goal, though may seem all idealistic but quite necessary moving god's original direction future looking all up from there & by all means better evaluator for all!!!!!

With best wishes, luck+regards,

Rajan Iyer

Dear Rajan,

Thank for your nice words and your wonderful philosophical analysis, and conclusions about scientific mainly academic research drawn by your experience all this years, which translates to wisdom.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil

Dear Thierry and Rajan,

Thank for input. You are right.

Specially for fundamentals research I mainly interested in, you need maximum freedom, with whatever this translates into, and from my experience there are little to none academic grands for fundamental research today and If there are their objectives are very specific and dictated by people paying these grands and very thought and imagination limiting for the researcher and in fact negating the fundamental research.

The researcher becomes an automaton to investigate only what he was told to investigate.

There is no the degree of freedom of thought needed for basic research. Also fundamental experimental research can be very expensive to carry out.

All fundamentals research breakthroughs were made two to three centuries ago

and with the exception of the dawn of the 19 century first two decades or so.

Name me one fundamentals breakthrough we did the last 75 years after WW2?

We are still burn chemicals to launch what?....rockets!!

So, yes in my opinion there is little fundamentals research carried today, which should really be our first priority if we want to visit the stars and really progress our civilization to the next step. This is partially due to the science doctrine which forbids out of the box thinking and part of money and corporations profit controlling nowadays science and research more oriented to technological advancement and not scientific breakthroughs which really comes always in the form of fundamentals breakthrough.

However, a fundamentals breakthrough comes always with the basic falsification of a status quo theory and today's science doctrine and paid ordered research, more than ever in any period of our history is not willing to let go or at least give it a try.

Emmanouil

First we conquered the fire next we conquered electricity next is that we conquer matter and are able to manipulate it at the quantum level (and by that I don't mean just destroy it through fusion or fission). But in order to do that we must first fully understand, as strangely it might sound today, EM.

I don't believe we've got it yet and unfortunately it will not ever happen without acknowledging a light medium. Magnetism is not an entirely relativistic phenomenon there are aspects of it that display non relativistic behavior specially in the cases where magnetic flux looses its curl.

quote: "Name me one fundamentals breakthrough we did the last 75 years after WW2?"

Microchips, laser technology, optic fibres."

Yes, these are mainly technological application and developments of fundamentals science discovered and breakthroughs, many decades and centuries ago.

quote:

" However, it might be stolen technology, copied from XXX??? "

hehe!! Nice one!!

Tesla is completely right. The Universe thinks as all living structures. These thoughts are caused justly vibrations. The main question is: what substance vibrates? The answer on this question is out boundaries of contemporary materialistic science. The object of this science is only material world fulled by material bodies and fields. But how was created this world and why it develops? What is source of Energy for further development. The answer on this question can be obtained if we'''ll consider material world as materialized state of non-material (energetic) world. It consists of Energy, which vibrates in various ranges: every range corresponds to material body (Universe, galaxy, star, planet, man, microbe,...) This Energy is Time (non-material substance) creating our material world. Materialization of Time is result of vibrations of different bodies and its parts. The Time is Fractal, because all world and all its fragments are fractals. Our Universe is Space of Time (not 4-dimensinal space-time)/ The Space of the Universe is multi-dimensional. Information (Energy) spreads momentary. Time creates all material bodies and fields by means of changes of energies (times) between different objects. The range of the Universe has maximal value, another structures have letter vibration. The thought is one of changes of energies (though is material substance). As all structures vibrate by changes of energies, they are living and thinking. We cannot understand many phenomena because we have own range --- the part of range of our planet, whose range is a part of range of the Sun,... All interactions between objects of the Universe are realized momentary but realized with different velocities. The proposed concept has experimental base: 1) astronomical observations of Kozyrev, where he determined positions of stars in the place where the star is in moment of observation; 2) studies of Morozov, where he determined how the weather depends on positions of nonstable stars and clusters of Carina constellation. Contemporary science cannot explain these results.

Dear Larisa,

Your mystical tales is your ignorance of nature. And material nature is perfect in its simplicity and harmony. Emmanouil Markoulakis is calling us back to basics. Now we are going to mysticism: the Higgs boson, gravitational waves, wormholes ... On the other hand - giant useless structures with a huge price: the hadron collider, ITER... But the basic laws of nature were obtained in experiments with chopsticks and ropes.

Notice that only Emmanouil asks such emotional questions. Only he asks a question "Name me one fundamentals breakthrough we did the last 75 years after WW2?" . Only he appreciated my book "Elektromagneti Gravity". If you find the time, look at it in Russian on my profile or on the website http://gravity.spb.ru.

Yours

Valeriy Pakulin

Dear Professor Valeriy Pakulin,

quote:... But the basic laws of nature were obtained in experiments with chopsticks and ropes.

The Truth has a bad habit to come always at last...

It is my hope that the truth about nature will at the end prevail and come out... it better be or humanity will end.

Your contribution to the truth is tremendous and must be recognized broadly.

The time is ticking.

Yours,

Emmanouil

Many ad hoc models are added to outlandish speculations that result in unexplained anomalies.

A paradigm shift is needed - right down to the core.

Tesla's primary interest was EM radiation, and of course his quote is a perspective of reality. From this perspective new insights into reality might be realized, but there are countless other possible perspectives of reality, some of which could also result in new understandings of reality.

Emmanouil is correct. Physics needs to take a step back and look at the fundamental units of measurement. This is what is leading physics down the wrong path. Current systems of units only partially work and are incapable of completely describing nature. The question now becomes. How do we fix a problem which is over one hundred years old?

Physics needs to find the minimum number of components that make-up everything in the universe.(perhaps 2).

exactly. there two elementary field modalities. dipoles and monopoles

Emmanouil Markoulakis I'm afraid your interest to the video shown in your thread's title could be misleading. The author of the video TinMan happens in many forums about Free Energy, OverUnity and mentions one legend of TPU of Steven Marks who has never been duplicated so far.

I happen to have done lot of testing and power metering assessment on anomalous energy claims. Many conclusions are wrong because the inventor do incorrect power measure and that is clearly the case here.

The video claims that an extremely small vibration can cause a large displacement but that is no proof of Aether coupling or anything. Any radio engineer knows that tuning a resonant LC tank with very high quality factor Q will stabilize with huge displacement effect (voltage or current) versus small input. Same story as the bridge of river Kwai or the Mackinaw bridge in Michigan. In the case of TinMan's video, his water tank geometries happens to be a finely resonant cavity which is excited by the acoustic transducer.

Do make a note that I'm a radio engineer (military and civilian industry) but also scientist, I do believe the physics suffer a crisis and needs new models. Practically if such theoretical innovation would be done then it could imply special generator pumping energy from other sources. However as of today, nobody has realized such feast and it is dangerous road to consider Nikola Tesla experience as such proof.

Teslas was like many other engineers discovering radio engineering, resonance, multi-media resonant cavity wether lump circuit or distributed circuit but this has no link aether engineering. By the way, I made my first Tesla coil back 40 years ago).

One classic error is to mix the active power versus reactive power. In the video of TinMan, he does not realize the strong movement of the water is reactive power due to high Q resonance.

Albert