I would like to propose a certain amendment to the way a lawsuit is conducted against a psychologist in general.
When a psychologist is sued for a lack of ethics and professionalism, he should be prohibited from publishing it, since the lawsuit was not filed against him as a private individual but as a psychologist (and he is obligated to maintain medical confidentiality, which exists even if the patient decides to sue him).
The same applies to the trial itself if there is already a legal proceeding against the therapist. The court should only be allowed to deal with material that deals with the content of the patient's claim (since even when the patient sues the therapist, the therapist still owes medical confidentiality to the patient).
Yaniv Hozez, I agree that when a psychologist is sued for a lack of ethics and professionalism, he should be prohibited from publishing it since the lawsuit was not filed against him as a private individual but as a psychologist, and he is obligated to maintain medical confidentiality.
Firstly, it is essential to recognize that psychologists have an ethical duty to protect the privacy and confidentiality of their clients. This obligation stems from the fundamental principle that individuals seeking psychological help should feel safe and secure in sharing their personal information without fear of exposure or judgment. By allowing psychologists to publish details about lawsuits filed against them, we are undermining this crucial principle.
Allowing psychologists to publish such information can have detrimental effects on both the profession itself and those seeking psychological assistance. Publishing these lawsuits may discourage potential clients from seeking help due to fears of their personal issues becoming public knowledge. This could lead to individuals suffering in silence rather than reaching out for much-needed support.
Furthermore, publishing lawsuits against psychologists may also compromise ongoing therapeutic relationships. Clients who are aware that their therapist has been involved in legal proceedings may question their therapist's credibility or trustworthiness, potentially hindering progress in therapy sessions.
Moreover, permitting publication could result in an unfair portrayal of psychologists' professional abilities. Lawsuits often involve complex legal arguments that may not accurately reflect a psychologist's competence or expertise within their field. Publishing these cases without proper context can mislead the public into forming negative opinions about all psychologists based on isolated incidents.
To address these concerns effectively, it is imperative that there be amendment of current laws governing lawsuits against psychologists. Prohibiting them from publishing details about such cases would safeguard both client confidentiality and professional reputation while maintaining public trust in the profession.
Reference:
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct: Including 2010 and 2016 Amendments. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
- Badges
- Science topic