I had construct the protein model using three software, I-TASSER, Raptor-X and Swissmodel. But, none of them are fulfilled Ramachandran plot criteria. So, how to improve the model for the next stage of study?
You can refine the model by GalaxyRefine webserver , it will generate 10 models and usually all refined models meet the criteria but occasionally model 1 is best fit.
Look at the templates used by swissmodel - what is their quality? If multiple well-resolved structures show the residue with the same poor phi/psi angles, it may be real.
e.g. for antibody variable domains:
"Immunoglobulin variable domains contain a number of positions with conserved positive Phi angles. Most, but not all of these positions show a strong preferences for Gly. Other residue types may have a destabilizing effect in those positions. VL kappa domains usually also contain two cis-prolines. cis-Pro L8 forms the "kink" in framework I. S.Spada et al. have shown that replacement of this cis-Pro by other residue types has a destabilizing effect. A similar cis-Pro is present in the equivalent position of many T-cell receptor variable domains. VL lambda and heavy chain variable domains have a one-residue deletion compared to VL kappa and do not contain conserved cis-prolines in the FR1 kink. A second conserved cis-Pro in Position L136 is responsible for the omega-loop conformation of the CDR 3 of most of the kappa domains"