None of the basic criteria is fulfilled.
No method is stated (or which science?), no definitions of terms used, no verifiable sources, no objectivity, no placing within a scholarly context, no criticism of sources, no debate provoked in the field.
The author refers to dance in general but actually means the single dance genre he knows, in his own country only.
Science is universal. The phenomenon of dance is universal.
So why do they use them at universities and colleges?
Apart from anthropological studies dance books are generally unscientific. However there is no real need for them to be, dancing is an aesthetic activity. There is no need to apply scientific or scholarly method to aesthetics.
Very little that is published about 'health' is in any way scientific.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Zero