Actually my Silver nanoparticle sample was scanned upto 60theta and in that region it gave 2 peaks as reported previously in literature but in almost all literature there are atleast 3 peaks for ag nanoparticles.. Is it ok?
@Yasir Iqbal
Your characterization is incomplete. Because with this scan you may not obtain some important (h k l) plane of (220) and (311).
I do not know the exact research problem, if in your research problem the characterization of such plane is not important then the characteristics peak of plane (111), (220) may be enough to establish elemental characterization of your sample.
so finally, your charcterization is incomplete but you may validate your result upto certain level (if your research problem allows).
thanks
@Yasir Iqbal
Your characterization is incomplete. Because with this scan you may not obtain some important (h k l) plane of (220) and (311).
I do not know the exact research problem, if in your research problem the characterization of such plane is not important then the characteristics peak of plane (111), (220) may be enough to establish elemental characterization of your sample.
so finally, your charcterization is incomplete but you may validate your result upto certain level (if your research problem allows).
thanks
@ Yasir Iqbal
Saurav kumar has said it right so you should go for XRD analysis till 80 degrees and by calculating intensity ratio of (200) and (111) peaks you could compare your data with JCPDS card no.
Sir Shiv peak plane 220 and 111 are in accordance with JCPDS but problem is that the lab engineer have not done full scan upto 80 degrees.. I was asking if its possible that i can use the results ?? Because I dont have now sample anymore i sent to other characterization!
@ Yasir
yes you probably could use this data.
hope you had done other characterization like UV-VIS,SEM,TEM
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Chemistry
- Nanotechnology
- Nanoparticle Research