I authored a paper titled

"The Essence of 'E': Revealing the Infinitely Infinite" in the IJFMR Volume 5, Issue 5, September-October 2023, authored by Haque Mobassir, Imtiyazul Haque, and Shaikh. The DOI is 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.7494.

In this paper, I introduced the concept of 'E' as the fundamental reason for all existence. I am now sharing a preprint of an experimental hypothesis to explore some ideas mentioned in the aforementioned paper

1. "Finite and Infinite originate from a common source, 'E.'"

2. "E is significantly smaller and lighter than any of its creations."

I would appreciate your thoughts after reviewing it.

Hello Haque,

I am unclear as to this point:

"leave this envelope untouched in an accelerated time speed arrangement"

What is a 'time speed arrangement'? And how do you propose to accelerate this situation?

Let's consider a crystal of aluminium oxide.

Would you admit that the aluminium and oxygen atoms are firmly positioned within that lattice?

If so, by what mechanism do you propose that a new atom is created when this crystal is accelerated?

And how much acceleration is needed?

Can you propose a model for this creation ex-nihilo?

I am also puzzled by this statement, "as both finite and infinite entities undergo mass changes after their creation"

Firstly, I am unaware of any infinite entities. Can you show me one and how you measured its mass?

Secondly, the mass of the electron is (as far as we know) not changing over time. Can you explain why you think an electron's mass changes?

James Garry Hello :) How are you,

I appreciate your time and your attention to my proposal. I kindly request your patience, as what I'm suggesting sound unconventional, and I lack supporting evidence. The entire saga of "E". However, with time, I aim to address all your questions. Today, let me attempt to answer one of your questions regarding "Accelerated Time Speed Arrangement."

Let's consider time from the perspective of a living being. If we place that being in a state where all actions and interactions within its biological body and all external energy interactions cease, time loses all significance for that specific biological being. However, if any of the mentioned factors continue, time becomes relevant. For example, if, within a 24-hour cycle, X number of body cells decay, but we increase the rate to 2X in the same time frame, we effectively accelerate time for that biological being.

In my proposed hypothesis or experiment, we aim to investigate how two atoms in close proximity in space affect each other.

I suggest that this close proximity will initiate a flow of matter/energy/interactions between the two enclosed atoms in very close distance of each other, and it will result in increased heat and vibrations. By amplifying these interactions multiple times in our experimental setup, I hypothesize that catastrophic separation will eventually occur.

By increasing the rate of the interactions manifold we are basically accelerating the time for these atoms so that we can see the break in 25 to 30yrs

Thank you for considering this.

Hello Haque,

And again, I'm at a loss as to how placing two atoms close together would lead to the formation of a third atom.

What is the process?

Why would an aluminium atom and an oxygen atom, held together very firmly in an alumina crystal not meet your criteria?

What would be the necessary spacing?

Dear Haque Mobassir Imtiyazul Haque Shaikh ,

1. You did not marked clear what meaning 'E' (entity, existence) such a way the term is unspecified.

2. You have contradiction in your reasoning in connection to the two terms:

Finite Existence:

'Finite entities are those with a definitive endpoint to their active existence.

Throughout their active existence, the various aspects of finite entities undergo continuous cycles of termination, culminating in the eventual cessation of the material's active existence (Somehow this does not fit the sentence.

Infinite Existence:

'In contrast, infinite existence also possesses an endpoint to its active existence,

but it deviates in two key aspects:

1. Its active existence surpasses the average lifespan of any finite entity.

2. Its intrinsic features remain unaltered throughout the entirety of its active

existence.'

(You are rather ambiguous made your point, because you know that what you have described is contradictory. In contrast to what?

infinite existence also possesses an endpoint to its active existence,

I have also created a concept of the world: with help a priori entity which is not equivalent to ordinary matter! Rest you can find it:

see the next article:

Article Fizikailag-metafizikailag bizonyítható a graviton létezése

(Hungarian)

some parts have English translation:

Research Proposal Physico-metaphysical proof of the existence of graviton (Fiz...

(abstract)

Chapter Physico-metaphysical proof of the existence of graviton

(conclushion)

Chapter 230902-En-H-Gr-t

(graviton)

I look forward to your criticism of my definitions, because then it becomes clearer what you really mean.

Regards,

Laszlo

P.S: The critics was made onto the base of attached file:

attached file the original article published on 13.10.2023 has not been reviewed.

Dear László Attila Horváth

I'd like to provide further clarification on the concepts of Finite and Infinite Existence.

Finite Existence: Finite entities are characterized by having a definitive endpoint to their active existence. Throughout their active lifespan, various aspects of finite entities continuously undergo cycles of termination, ultimately leading to the cessation of their active material existence.

For example, consider the life cycle of a creature. It experiences biological and physical growth during its existence. However, at a certain point, physical growth slows down while biological age continues to increase. After some time again the physical growth starts showing reflection of biological age, and after a certain time the life will cease to exist, its meaningful existence ceases when life ends, and it may decay, decompose, or transform into another form. This concept also applies to celestial bodies like stars.

Infinite Existence: In contrast, infinite existence also has an endpoint to its active existence, but it differs in two crucial ways: 1. Its active existence surpasses the average lifespan of any finite entity. 2. Its intrinsic features remain unchanged throughout its entire active existence.

To clarify, infinite existence stands in contrast to finite existence.

For example, consider the force of gravitational pull. You can attempt to escape it or mitigate its impact in specific situations, such as within a capsule. However, its fundamental feature remains constant throughout its entire existence. It does not diminish with age or increase in youth. It continues to operate as it did yesterday. If, for instance, the solar system were to collapse, the Earth's gravitational pull might lose its significance or come to an end. This end signifies the termination of all its aspects in one final event, marking the conclusion of its active existence.

Thank you for sharing your publications. I will review them at my earliest convenience.