Google’s deep-learning program (AlphaFold) for determining the 3D shapes of proteins stands claims that the AlphaFold, outperformed around 100 other teams in a biennial protein-structure prediction challenge called CASP.
I recommend a well written and nuanced description how to estimate the true value (and ethics) when it comes to AlphaFold: https://dasher.wustl.edu/bio5357/discussion/oxford-alphafold2.pdf One important conclusion I think is important (and I think I agree) is: that it might be that AlphaFold 2 has solved the problem of protein prediction but certainly not “as many press releases have claimed, the protein folding problem. DeepMind’s code will provide no information of how a polypeptide, or an ensemble of chains, assembles within seconds into the intricate structure it requires to function. It can just provide an accurate estimation of the crystal structure, which is just a snapshot of the conformation of the protein.”
I recommend a well written and nuanced description how to estimate the true value (and ethics) when it comes to AlphaFold: https://dasher.wustl.edu/bio5357/discussion/oxford-alphafold2.pdf One important conclusion I think is important (and I think I agree) is: that it might be that AlphaFold 2 has solved the problem of protein prediction but certainly not “as many press releases have claimed, the protein folding problem. DeepMind’s code will provide no information of how a polypeptide, or an ensemble of chains, assembles within seconds into the intricate structure it requires to function. It can just provide an accurate estimation of the crystal structure, which is just a snapshot of the conformation of the protein.”
It will be surely helpful in applied science tasks like drug discovery or simulation of mutation , it is not a breakthru as for basic science where problems like allosteric effect, molecular machines, creation of liquid-liquid interfaces ask for physically relevant models and not brute force.