The quantum mechanical nature of atomic objects can be difficult to explain to an audience of non-experts. I was wondering whether the following analogy might be suitable: most people are familiar with the game that already very small children play, namely to stack wooden blocks on top of one another, building a higher and higher tower ... until it topples and comes crashing down. :-) My idea was to state that it is fairly easy to stack two blocks on top of another; even three or four, and so on. But as the number of blocks becomes larger, the tower becomes more and more unstable, and will crash down at the slightest disturbance. - The analogy to quantum mechanics would be that one of the essential features is that of superposition: atomic systems or even small molecular systems can be easily put into a state of superposition and stay there. However, for objects built of many atoms (hundreds, thousands, millions, ... 10 to the power of 23!), this becomes quickly impossible. The slightest disturbance from the environment will cause the superposition to be destroyed and the system "crashes down" (collapses) into a single state.

What do you think about this analogy? Is it a good one, or is it lacking in certain ways? Would you modify it? I am curious to hear your thoughts!

/ralph

More Ralph H. Scheicher's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions