This is a growing problem, if my observations are right. Not only are authors sloppy when they cite, the journal in which you are cited may have problems with quality checks, too. There is not much that you can do, but to make sure that YOU are careful when you cite. You certainly cannot influence a journal editor to correct a mistake.

You can request the editor to publish an erratum. However, chances of publishing such an erratum is almost is very very less.

As stated by Michael Patriksson, you have to be careful in future.

The chances of correction is so remote and publishing an erratum may not be possible for this mistake.

The author who wrote the article should have cited properly or corrected the mistake latest by proofing stage. Many journals generate reference checking report at the time of manuscript submission. It is the author's responsibility to validate all citations before approving submission. The production editor is also responsible for checking the reference section during proofing and publication stage.

Currently most journals link DOI of cited articles with the online article under reference section. If DOI is matched correctly, you will still receive a citation count in your Scopus or ResearcherID profile in spite of spell errors in authors name/title name/journal name/volume no and year of publication.

I agree with the last comment. Corrections can't be made after publication and if at all, it will be published as erratum which I doubt in this case because most top journals run reference checking or have reference DOI(s) in their publications.