By using standard curve of protein concentration you have to calculate the concentration of protein. Take a OD of your unknown sample and draw a perpendicular on x-axis from straight line passing through origin of standard curve. So you get the exact concentration of protein in your sample.
You determine the absorbance vs concentration of a standard protein, whose dye-binding is similar to the protein you are interested in. The concentration range should span the concentration you expect from your sample.
Then you calculate a regression curve through these points. The Bradford assay does not yield straight lines, but curves. A second order parabola (y = a + bx + cx2) is adequate. This can be done conveniently in most scientific graphing packages (SigmaPlot, Origin, gnuplot, SciDAVis; the latter two are open source).
Then you determine the absorbance of your sample and calculate the x-value that corresponds to this y-value, that is, you use the inverse of the function you calculated in the previous step.
The crux with this procedure is that the colour yield of different proteins is different. For example, BSA has hydrophobic pockets that bind more CBB (active ingredient in Bradford's reagent) than most other proteins. IgG is a much better standard for this type of assay.
Abdmajid Hwej, you can't use your obtained 3-point calibration curve (y = 0,037x + 0,128), because OD unknown sample is out of linear range. Coefficient of determination (R² = 0,9481 ) is too low, for calibration curve you should use at least 5-6 points ( 2, 4, 8, 12,16 ug/100 ul H2O )
I did this week but i got some problems. I run the gel to detect endothelial NOS (t eNOS and p eNOS) in different mice genotype (HT, WT and AMPKalpha1 KO), I used anti t eNOS and ant p eNOS as a primary antibodies and Donkey anti mouse green and Donkey anti rabbit red as secondary anti body, and the DSD gel was 15%. The band was not clear I do not know what is the matter.
I am trying to compere between t eNOS and p eNOS in different mice genotype