One of the main objectives of a meta-analysis is to obtain reliable estimates of treatment effects when RCT results are not sufficient. The optimal information size (OIS) can be defined as the minimum amount of information needed in a meta-analysis to obtain reliable conclusions about an intervention. The calculation of OIS suggests a limit on the conduct of clinical trials in the area, indicating whether the existing information is sufficiently convincing to the extent that new RCTs on that subject are no longer needed.

The OIS assumes that all RCTs studied are part of a single large RCT. However, when we observe data heterogeneity, it is not appropriate to make this kind of assumption. Consequently, heterogeneity should be considered when the OIS is calculated, since its increase requires a larger information size.

In this sense my questions are as follows:

- How to calculate the optimal information size (OIS) adjusted for meta-analysis heterogeneity?

- If there is no possibility of determining if the meta-analysis is conclusive using the tool of the calculation of the OIS, is it possible and advisable to perform a qualitative evaluation of the confidence interval generated by the meta-analysis?

More Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions