07 December 2017 5 8K Report

In the NIH format of writing up an experiment, the aim, methods, results, etc. are clear and follow one another in order. This standard of writing is good, but it is not always feasible in the lab where one is working, thinking, and recording constantly.

Should I keep a "rough" lab notebook for day to day use and a "clean" one just for recording experiments? The only problem that I see with this strategy is that the rough notebook is actually more revealing as to the chronological thought process of the scientist and therefore more important than the clean one. I don't know if having dual notebooks is even allowed under NIH guidelines.

I want my notebook to be useful for future readers, but I don't want to painstakingly record while in the midst of an experiment. I want to jot down interesting things without carving them in the stone of my lab notebook.

More David Schad's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions