I want to understand if there is any research telling the accuracy of AI tools when investigating human rights violations and war crimes
Both are subjective and complex phenomena and hence AI is not reliable but the info can be fact checked with reliable and dependable sources.
An example of the use of artificial intelligence in investigation is Russia's war on Ukraine, where images of the atrocities committed now number in the hundreds of thousands.
It is the first conflict for which such rich evidence has been produced simultaneously, but the sheer volume of material presents a major challenge to those trying to use it as evidence of war crimes.
There is an application that allows NGOs to collect evidence, founded by Wendy Bates, called, eyeWitness to Atrocities.
The international experts are part of a plan unveiled by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for a "special mechanism" to investigate thousands of accusations of war crimes.
But despite all the advantages of the technology, this type of video recording has only played a prominent role in a limited number of court cases.
Ukraine may be a leader in collecting evidence using technology.
The case in reference is yet again a normative investigation. The Video footages and other data though voluminous are aimed at proving all actions as war crimes. The findings are obvious in such studies. And still it’s difficult to trust AI in such a crucial research.
AI is one more fraud of the Elite, on the top of media, academia, and politics.
- Badges
- Science topic