How does the universe manage all these galaxies?

The cosmic energy (mastermind or grand design) of the universe is showing us, with the strongest evidence, that grouping all the galaxies at a moderate distance from each other and separating them with a special space, called raw space, makes it difficult for galaxies to interact or interfere with each other unless the universe wants them to for a specific reason. The colliding of galaxies is meaningful for the universe and moving them around has its own principles that men will never be able to understand. It is obvious that when the universe was born, it was very small; and by the nature of its growth to get to its current size, it went through billions of these collisions and movement of galaxies.

The raw space between galaxies is a very clear space with no temperature, which makes it impossible for an atom to survive, which means that even sunlight does not exist outside the galaxies. In simple terms, it makes it impossible for us to travel between galaxies because anything that is made of atoms needs temperature to survive. This scenario is one of the characteristics of the universe. Thus, since there is no temperature, there is no wave either based on the physics that we know; therefore, nothing is moving between galaxies, not even wave or gravitational wave as LIGO is claiming.

The separation of galaxies is hard evidence that sunlight is exhausted on the rim of a galaxy. Logically sunlight’s speed varies through its traveling. However, there is no spot in any galaxy without temperature (we communicate with our instruments in space through wave-temperature) . This significant evidence proves that the speed of sunlight cannot be a constant phenomenon as traditionally science has persuaded and impressed upon us. Sunlight travels at different speeds throughout its galaxy only. Therefore, communication in the galaxy is possible but not outside the galaxy where there is no wave-temperature. Here should mention that artificial light (flashlight) is different from sunlight.

When we come into a galaxy, each galaxy has a precise movement that is coordinated with the universe’s rotation, and each solar system is coordinated with the speed of the galaxy. Furthermore, each planet is following the solar system’s laws and movements. In general, there are a lot of things going on in each galaxy, and it needs a well-built organization to put all these planets on the right track in the limited space of a galaxy.

As you can imagine, all the elements in the universe are connected, like a tree. Every building block—from the smallest element of an atom to the largest element of the universe, space—and the universe itself must work together in fine-tuned unison.

The center of the universe is where all the commands are issued, but what kind of power is actually running the universe is a mystery. But this huge organization needs a center to run it. From the universe’s current size, each time when the volume is increased, more new raw galaxies are born. As the universe is rotating, the raw galaxies become independent of each other and slowly spread apart and dive into the universe. It is a mystery as to how the universe manages all these new galaxies and separates them at moderate distances from each other, or maybe on some occasions, it makes one galaxy out of two. All my intuition is explicit in that the universe is a smart entity and feeds itself from the outside. That is why it is working accordingly.

There is the possibility that as the universe is rotating, it is creating tremendous noise; but due to raw space, the noise cannot be transferred. Yet all the large elements in a galaxy make noise that we

can detect due to friction with space, which means it is not black holes as some believe.

Therefore, through the experiments that we have at hand and the science that we are practicing and with the astronaut’s experimentation in space, many more things are becoming transparent. Analyzing this evidence brings us to several conclusions:

1) The universe is not infinite because infinite does not have an inside or an outside to create a movement. Infinite, to our standard, is relative; but an absolute infinite is static and has no movement to create the law of action-reaction.

2) The shape of the universe must be spherical and have such rotation to make all the planets spherical. The only reason that all the planets are spherical and the unification of atoms and molecules in space is circular is that they are coming from the rotational force of the universe. There is no other explanation for this phenomenal shape. It is impossible for a flat universe to duplicate this effect.

3) The rotation of the universe makes zero gravity in space. This phenomenon is supported by scientific evidence as in the astronaut’s experiment.

4) Gravity must be an internal component of atoms, not an external of mass. Science knows that the most common elements in space are hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen. Empirical evidence shows the spherical unification of these elements in intergalactic space.

5) The rotation of a hollow spherical universe makes all the galaxies have polarities of north/south. Cosmology has proven that our solar system is in this line, and Earth is also located on this line, for same reason Earth has polarity.

6) The rotation of the universe is making the galaxies inside the universe weightless, and the weightlessness of the galaxies must have an opposite rotation from the universe’s rotation to keep the universe weightless as well based on the duality principle.

7) This phenomenon of opposite rotational directions makes any object on any planet in any galaxy stand upright on the surface of that planet due to the torque (i.e., humans can walk on the moon, the rover on Mars can maneuver, and we on Earth are the best evidence of this occurrence).

8) The rotation of the universe is situated in such a manner as to manage these several hundreds of billions of galaxies all around the universe depending on the size of the galaxies and how they are situated in the universe. Evidence shows that galaxies have two different spinning rotations. This remark is showing that the universe must have polarities as well.

9) The spherical shape of the universe is allowing us to analyze an unlimited number of stars and galaxies of a three-dimensional horizon in the space of the universe according to our standard of infinite. But imagine, if the universe is flat, we could not see all these galaxies because of a limited horizon. This is another way to say that the universe is not flat.

10) Since all the scientists observed and agreed that the universe is expanding, it means that the three dimensions of space increase at the same rate, and it makes the distance of each galaxy spread away from each other and stretches the edge of the universe away from the center.

11) Each galaxy has diverse rotation with various speeds based on where they are located in the universe. The south side galaxies have reverse rotation/somersault/positioning from the north side.

12) The universal law is the same everywhere. Thus, there is no locality or non-locality exist in this complete entity of intrinsic universe (all the chemical in the universe must be the same and act the same).

Jakub Jagielski added a reply:

1. There is no "raw space" or pure vacuum. At extremely low density, intergalactic medium still carries matter.

2. Electromagnetic wave ("sunlight") propagates in vacuum, between galaxies.

3. Speed of light is constant in vacuum.

4. Atoms do not "survive". Atoms do not need temperature to exist.

5. There is no evidence for rotating universe.

6. There is still no evidence regarding shape of universe.

7. There is no evidence for galaxies "polarity"

8. Universe as a "smart entity": This is a non-scientific, metaphysical claim without empirical support.

9. ...

10. ...

Reply to this discussion

Larissa Borissova added a reply:

The Universe posseses a fractal structure. Our Milky Way is one of the galaxies in the Universe --- a fragment of the fractal “The Universe”. All galaxies are also fragments of the fractal “Universe”, which is a fragment of a more great structure... Motion of cosmic bodies in the Galaxy is due to two factors --- the gravitational field and rotation of various fragments of the fractal “Universe”. Time is the main manager of all objects of the Universe. The pace of the observed time T for a real observer depends on the gravitational potential w and velocity of his reference frame's rotation. Our rotating and gravitating planet Earth is a fragment of the Sun fractal, which is a fragment of the Milky Way, the Universe... Because the Milky Way is a fragment of the Fractal “Infinity”, we can study the structure of the Universe, applying the method of analogies. It means that a real observer is a fragment of the Fractal “Infinity”, whose manager is Time. Using the theory of physically observable quantities of Zelmanov, we obtain: any real observer can exist in the region where the condition dT = w + v_i u^i < c^2 is fulled, where w = c^2[1 –(g_00)^1/2] is the gravitational potential, T is the observed time. The quntity w is the gravitational potential, v_i is the velocity of the 3-dimensional observed space rotation, u^i is the 3-dimensional velocity, c is the light velocity. If w + v_i u^i = c^2, then the observed time is stopped for a real observer. If v_i= 0 also, then w = c^2. This means that the gravitational energy is maximum. For example, this case is realized for Schwarzschild metric, where the component g_00 = 0 by the condition r = r_g, where r_g = 2GM/c^2is the gravitational radius. This means that collapse is the state of maximum value of the gravitational energy. Thus just rotation does not allow the state of collapse. We can therefore consider the rotation of cosmic bodies as the necessary condition of their existence in the Universe.

Eric Baird added a reply:

The expansion of the universe is sometimes assigned a radial distance value, a, which is the radius of the hypersphere, and is also the idealised worldline for a particle at a given location on the hypersphere (radial time).

Time flows more slowly where the g-field is denser (gravitational time dilation), and more quickly where the field is less dense.

By extrapolation, regions between galaxies should age more quickly. If expansion is also measure of timeflow (a-coordinate), then space expands faster in the intergalactic voids. We then have a positive-feedback mechanism whereby the more rarefied the region of void, the faster it expands, and the even more rarefied it becomes.

We already know that expansion has to be slower in more populated areas, because if the entire universe expanded at exactly the same rate, we wouldn't be able to detect it: atom-sizes would enlarge by exactly the same amount as Hubble-redshifted wavelengths, our reference-rulers would expand at the same rate as the universe they were measuring, and the universe would appear to us to be a constant size. So Hubble expansion is a measure of differential expansion.

This non-linear behaviour then leads us to expect to see a bubble-like structure at large scales, and we actually see something like this in deep space surveys, with galaxies concentrated into "walls" between pairs of neighbouring voids, and "strands" where three voids (and three walls) meet.

https://classic.sdss.org/legacy/

In other words, the shape of the universe is less like an orange (spheroidal with little pits) and more like a raspberry (lots of expanding empty lobes).

One of the side-effects of non-linearity is that we lose the gravitational "floor", and the field-density between galaxies can be more rarefied than we'd calculate just by averaging a background distribution of matter over a spherical volume. `This means that a galaxy should lens more strongly ... not because there is more massenergy inside the galaxy, but because there is less outside. With reduced coupling between galaxies' matter, a rotating galaxy becomes a more self-contained unit, (perhaps explaining the galaxy rotation curve problem), so nonlinearity seems like a good suggestion for explaining things that we currently blame on dark matter.

Preprint Dark matter without dark matter

In other words, the enhanced lensing and increased cohesiveness of galaxies can either be explained by assigning more massenergy to the galaxies (dark matter) so that the field density inside the galaxies is stronger ... or by assigning non-linearity to expansion, so that the field density outside and between the galaxies is weaker.

Another side-effect of nonlinear expansion is that the elapsed time since the start of the universe in an empty fast-expanding lobe (worldline length) can be longer than the elapsed time and hyperspehere radius in one of the slower-expanding regions between the lobes. So different parts of the universe have different ages.

This allows an isolated star without a parent galaxy, or one that has spent time in a void before being ejected, to be older than the "official" current age of the universe, as calculated by someone living inside a galaxy. This may explain the properties of HD 140283 :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_140283

Harri Shore added a reply:

lots to unpack here - Here are the obvious;

( extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence)

1. Scientific Misconceptions

• “Raw Space”: The concept of “raw space” as a region with no temperature, atoms, or waves misrepresents intergalactic space. Intergalactic space does contain particles, cosmic microwave background radiation, and gravitational waves.

• Speed of Sunlight Varies: This claim contradicts well-established physics. The speed of light in a vacuum is constant (299,792,458 m/s) and does not vary.

• Gravity as an Internal Component of Atoms: Gravity is not an atomic property but an emergent force due to mass and energy curvature of spacetime, as described by Einstein’s General Relativity.

2. Unsupported Speculations:

• The idea that galaxies “collide because the universe wants them to” anthropomorphizes natural processes. Galaxy collisions are well-understood to result from gravitational interactions, not a “grand design.”

• The claim that the universe has a “center where all commands are issued” is at odds with the widely accepted cosmological principle that the universe has no center and is isotropic on large scales.

• Assertions about dual rotational directions and “torque” enabling upright positioning lack empirical or theoretical support.

3. Inconsistent or Misleading Language:

• Terms like “raw galaxies,” “sunlight speed varies,” and “rotational force of the universe” are not standard in scientific discourse and confuse rather than clarify.

• The suggestion that astronauts’ experiences in zero gravity support the rotation of a hollow spherical universe is a misunderstanding of microgravity and orbital mechanics.

4. Contradictions and Logical Errors:

• The text states that gravitational waves don’t exist outside galaxies, contradicting direct observations by LIGO.

• It conflates the absence of temperature with the absence of waves, overlooking phenomena like electromagnetic waves, which do not require a medium or temperature to propagate.

5. Misinterpretation of Cosmic Expansion:

• The text assumes that galaxies being “separated at moderate distances” is a deliberate act, whereas the observed expansion is a consequence of the universe’s dynamics governed by dark energy.

Recommendations….

1. Consult Established Science

• Refer to foundational works in cosmology and astrophysics (e.g., by Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne, or Sean Carroll) to better understand concepts like the Big Bang, cosmic expansion, and General Relativity.

• Study observational evidence from instruments like Hubble, JWST, and LIGO to ground claims in verifiable data.

2. Clarify Concepts

• Define terms like “raw space,” “raw galaxies,” and “universal laws” more rigorously, ensuring consistency with existing physical theories.

3. Separate Philosophy from Science

• While it’s fine to include philosophical musings, distinguish them clearly from scientific claims to avoid confusing readers about what is speculative and what is evidence-based.

4. Focus on Testable Claims

• If proposing new ideas (e.g., dual rotation or torque effects), outline specific observational or experimental methods to validate them.

5. Avoid Anthropomorphism

• Refrain from ascribing intent or purpose to natural processes (e.g., “the universe wants” or “commands are issued”). Stick to mechanisms and physical principles.

6. Refine Language

• Use precise terminology and avoid conflating unrelated concepts (e.g., “temperature” and “waves”).

Recommend

Abbas Kashani

• University of Mohaghegh Ardabili