It does not reduce the conflict, even in the case of multiple views. And it can not, even if the number of views make the viewing very close to a continuum parallax. An ideal system must be capable of entering diferent ray directions within the pupil of each eye, to allow for diferentiated focusing.
Hi Sai,
If a parallax pitch of 3d display is large or directivity of light into eyes is low,the reduction is not effective.
If a parallax pitch of 3d display is small enough and directivity of light into eyes is high,
"Super multi view" state is occured and the reduction is effective.
Please refer to the following link.
Maybe, this would be the most suitable document for your question.
http://www.tuat.ac.jp/~e-takaki/research/pdf/global3d.pdf
I think Integral Imaging systems might have no discrepancy between eye convergence and accomodation because the light rays from the object are reconstructed with correct directions, the so-called light field. In Integral Imaging, an array of small lenses is used to project an array of small images. If these images are recorded, rotated by 180 degrees, and projected backward through a similar array of lenses, a 3D autostereoscopic image is constructed whose light rays behave similarly to those from the original object.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Papers