Your question is very interesting ... I think it could help to share a database among researchers with those journals that are not of impact or "good science" because of their origin.
We could generate a network of academics destined for this purpose
I write back with a very straightforward "I will not be able to perform this review."
Thank you for your kind answers. It is not difficult to identify the "good" journals by their IF or the presence in databases such as Scopus, CAB abstracts, Medline... My question was due to the fact that some editors, even after a refuse, keep sending requests, and I would like to know how other researchers behave in similar situations. I will keep rejecting the invitations.
I decline it. Predatory journals are unethical and we have to clearly disapprove and deny any support.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media
- Journalism