I would like to ask for insights regarding the image I uploaded. The background is a scanned cross-polarized light (XPL) photomosaic of a thin section, with cathodoluminescence (CL) images of selected regions overlaid for comparison.

The dark layers are composed of rhythmically laminated dolomitic mudstone, consisting of alternating fine-grained dolomitic and dark mud-rich laminae. In contrast, the light-colored layer shows high-order white interference colors under cross-polarized light and was initially interpreted as dolomite. However, this layer is non-luminescent under CL imaging and shows no response to alizarin red S staining. Elemental mapping (EDS) reveals high Si content and relatively low Mg content. Additionally, this light-colored layer frequently contains scattered microcrystalline quartz aggregates.

The sample is from a Permian alkaline lake system that was strongly influenced by volcanic and hydrothermal activity. The sediments in this interval commonly contain minerals such as shortite, eitelite (Na₂Mg(CO₃)₂), and gaylussite (Na₂Ca(CO₃)₂·5H₂O).

Questions:

  • If the high-order interference color layer is truly dolomite, why does it appear dark under cathodoluminescence, and why is it Si-rich with low Mg content?
  • If the layer is instead composed of quartz or cryptocrystalline silica, how can we explain the unusually strong interference colors under XPL, given quartz's typically low birefringence?
  • What could be the origin of the microcrystalline quartz aggregates within this light-colored layer?
  • Any ideas, references, or similar case studies would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance!

    Similar questions and discussions