Very few NGO cover mental health and social health promotion, I think activities by Non governmental organizations(NGO)may decrease rate of rapes and sexual assaults in Insurgency torn regions ,how do we measure the impact of those few involved.?
Any abnormal or ill intentions, concepts and behavior cause sicknesses eventually. In order to find solutions, I found a way to do prevention for it to remove the body and mental blockage in the very beginning of discomfort. Therefore, I founded the Comprehensive Universal Energy Healing. People can notice good ethic is directly related to his health due to practicing the good ethic of love, or gratitude, or sharing, or collaboration, the qi (energy plus circulating materials in the body) flowing in the body getting increased. When qi flowing gets strong, the person is healthier.
When people always give gratitude, he can generate forgiveness gradually to release his mental burden gradually.
The function of the Comprehensive Universal Energy Healing is to raise a person's body, mind, soul overall frequency to achieve a happy, healthy and abundant life. For individuals can expand the self-healing to his family members, loved ones to the whole community and further more to his country and the whole world.
Please google power vs force to understand the frequency power and read the attached file of the original book p. 107-108 to realize the power of invisible universal regulations.
This is from my attached paper:
While deployed MH modules in complex emergencies clearly showed qualitative and anecdotal benefits, enthusiastic research was soon confronted by the boring but unavoidable questions about standards of care, empirical research, measurable outcomes and quality control.
An example of the current state of affairs is the array of competing views on the outcome indicators. The opinions range from advocating for the use of formalized but highly controversial GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning), as suggested by Van Ommeren, & Wietse (2011), and, on the other extreme, to statements that standardized evidenced-based practices are inapplicable in complex emergencies by definition. These apologists argue that every situation is unique, and that there is no general tool to measure individual suffering, and any assistance makes victims feel supported and thus has humanitarian value just by virtue of doing something. Other widely used efficacy criteria based on self-reported satisfaction, symptom reduction, or simply the number of sessions provided and persons served. The limited progress and lack of consistency in demonstrating the programs’ effectiveness to the professional communities, organizations, and donors continued to force the question of the overall impact and value of this work.
HAPPY NEW YEAR, EVERYONE!
Article It Takes a Village: Community-Based Psychological Recovery i...