During the execution of the following command:

gmx grompp -f ions.mdp -c solv.gro -p topol.top -o ions.tpr

in Gromacs MD Simulation, I get the following result with errors.

GROMACS: gmx grompp, version 2020.1-Ubuntu-2020.1-1

Executable: /usr/bin/gmx

Data prefix: /usr

Working dir: /mnt/c/Users/Raphael/Desktop/Gromacs/540-GROMACS

Command line:

gmx grompp -f ions.mdp -c solv.gro -p topol.top -o ions.tpr

Ignoring obsolete mdp entry 'title'

Ignoring obsolete mdp entry 'ns_type'

NOTE 1 [file ions.mdp]:

With Verlet lists the optimal nstlist is >= 10, with GPUs >= 20. Note

that with the Verlet scheme, nstlist has no effect on the accuracy of

your simulation.

Setting the LD random seed to 919551497

WARNING 1 [file 540.prm, line 36]:

Bondtype U-B was defined previously (e.g. in the forcefield files), and

has now been defined again. This could happen e.g. if you would use a

self-contained molecule .itp file that duplicates or replaces the

contents of the standard force-field files. You should check the contents

of your files and remove such repetition. If you know you should override

the previous definition, then you could choose to suppress this warning

with -maxwarn.

old: 124.6 391.622 0 0 124.6 391.622 0 0

new: CG2O1 NG2S1 CG2O6 5 120.000000 418.400000 0.00000000 0.00

ERROR 1 [file 540.prm, line 53]:

Encountered a second block of parameters for dihedral type 9 for the same

atoms, with either different parameters and/or the first block has

multiple lines. This is not supported.

ERROR 2 [file 540.prm, line 60]:

Encountered a second block of parameters for dihedral type 9 for the same

atoms, with either different parameters and/or the first block has

multiple lines. This is not supported.

Generated 97877 of the 97903 non-bonded parameter combinations

Generating 1-4 interactions: fudge = 1

Generated 64492 of the 97903 1-4 parameter combinations

ERROR 3 [file 540.itp, line 94]:

No default Bond types

ERROR 4 [file 540.itp, line 95]:

No default Bond types

ERROR 5 [file 540.itp, line 299]:

No default U-B types

ERROR 6 [file 540.itp, line 300]:

No default U-B types

ERROR 7 [file 540.itp, line 301]:

No default U-B types

ERROR 8 [file 540.itp, line 302]:

No default U-B types

ERROR 9 [file 540.itp, line 330]:

No default U-B types

ERROR 10 [file 540.itp, line 331]:

No default U-B types

ERROR 11 [file 540.itp, line 332]:

No default U-B types

ERROR 12 [file 540.itp, line 418]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 13 [file 540.itp, line 419]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 14 [file 540.itp, line 420]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 15 [file 540.itp, line 424]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 16 [file 540.itp, line 425]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 17 [file 540.itp, line 426]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 18 [file 540.itp, line 428]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 19 [file 540.itp, line 429]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 20 [file 540.itp, line 466]:

No default Proper Dih. types

ERROR 21 [file 540.itp, line 469]:

No default Proper Dih. types

Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type 'Protein_chain_A'

Excluding 3 bonded neighbours molecule type '540'

NOTE 2 [file topol.top, line 44220]:

System has non-zero total charge: -2.000000

Total charge should normally be an integer. See

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic

for discussion on how close it should be to an integer.

-------------------------------------------------------

Program: gmx grompp, version 2020.1-Ubuntu-2020.1-1

Source file: src/gromacs/gmxpreprocess/grompp.cpp (line 669)

Fatal error:

number of coordinates in coordinate file (solv.gro, 62424)

does not match topology (topol.top, 4731)

For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors

PLEASE I NEED A SOLUTION TO THIS ERROR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. I AM ALSO NEW TO GROMACS MD SIMULATION.

THE ATTACHED FILES ARE PICTURES OF THE ERROR AND ALSO THE solv.gro and topol.top

THANKS

More Raphael Onuku's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions