I used gstat to fit a Matern variogram model to my crop yield by setting the kappa = 0.5. To my surprise, its parameter estimates are exactly the same with that of exponential. Does it mean that there is no point in fitting a matern model? When I set the kappa = 0.7, the parameter estimates are now different from that exponential. Could anyone tell me the appropriate value for kappa? Having known that matern is a generalized form of theoretical variogram, is it worth fitting a matern model when I have already fitted the common theoretical variogram (spherical Gaussian, and exponential)?

exponential model

model psill range

1 Nug 0.04281109 0.00000

2 Exp 0.76810071 5.45954

Matern Model

model psill range kappa

1 Nug 0.04281109 0.00000 0.0

2 Mat 0.76810071 5.45954 0.5

R Script## Exponential variogram model

exp.var

More Moshood Bakare's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions