How did Enstein fall into the Riemann trap?

Cauchy Curvature Tensor in the 3D geometric space is expressed as follows:

Fxx Fxy Fxz

Fyx Fyy Fyz

Fzx Fzy Fzz . . (1)

The equivalence of this tensor in the 4-dimensional unit is,

Fxx Fxy Fxz Fxt

Fyx Fyy Fyz Fyt

Fzx Fzy Fzz Fzt

Ftx  Fty Ftz   Ftt . . . (2)

We can express the forces tensor by the Laplacian formula,

∇2xx ∇2xy ∇2xz ∇2xt [U]

∇2yx ∇2yy ∇2yz ∇2yt [U]

∇2zx ∇2zy ∇2zz ∇2zt [U]

∇2tx ∇2ty  ∇2tz  ∇2tt [U] . . . (3)

Where t is time in the 4-dimensional unit space xyzt.

and Fxy= ∇^2yx U(x,y,z,t),Ftx =   ∇^2yt U(x,y,z,t). ., etc.

This tensor is called the Cairo  tensor to distinguish it from the steady-state Riemann tensor.

Note that:

i-Equation 3 when multiplied by the curvature tensor is by itself the general relativity in one phrase.

ii- Formula 2 reduces to Cauchy Formula 1 as dU/dt)partial approaches zero.

iii- The time-dependent Rieman tensor R relates the space-time curvature to the energy density U in a strange way,

Curvature C is equal or proportional to energy density (C=const1 .E . . . 4).

This is false and missleading relation since the correct relation should be Curvature is inversely proportional to U ( .U x C =Const 2 . . . 5) in accordance with the universal law of 4D Lorentz transformation law which imples that the unitary xyzt space is constant or conserved durind its motion.

But here comes the satanic trap where Einstein fell in without retun by following or trying to prove the wrong relation 4 instead of the correct one 5 .

The author assumes that Einstein didnot understand physics to the extent he assumes the relation between space curvature and  energy density is a relation of proportionality where as space curvature should be inversely proportinal to the energy density as implied by the 4D xyzt Lorentz universal law of physics:

The  spacetime is constant or conserved under motion.

However, Enstein went to his black magic recalled some thinking experiment we call blac magic and erroneosly proved his false rule in 1915 curvature induces energy density not the other way around.

The question arises: If Einstein procedure is wrong how it comes that his results are perfect

The answer is simple, both equations 4,5 can yield the same results if the square of the curvature tensor is I which is the second part of the satanic trap.

==================

How did Einstein fall into Riemann's trap?

The Cauchy curvature tensor in three-dimensional geometric space is expressed as follows:

Fxx Fxy Fxz

Fyx Fyy Fyz

Fzx Fzy Fzz . . (1)

The extension of this tensor in unitary four-dimensional space is:

Fxx Fxy Fxz Fxt

Fyx Fyy Fyz Fyt

Fzx Fzy Fzz Fzt

Ftx Fty Ftz Ftt . . . (2)

The above force tensor can also be expressed by the Laplacian formula:

∇2xx ∇2xy ∇2xz ∇2xt [U]

∇2yx ∇2yy ∇2yz ∇2yt [U]

∇2zx ∇2zy ∇2zz ∇2zt [U]

∇2tx ∇2ty ∇2tz ∇2tt [U] . . . (3)

Where t is time in the 4-dimensional unit space xyzt.

and Fxy = ∇^2yx U(x,y,z,t), Ftx = ∇^2yt U(x,y,z,t). ., etc.

This tensor is called the Cairo tensor to distinguish it from the stationary Riemann tensor. Note that:

Equation 3 multiplied by the curvature tensor is general relativity in a single sentence.

Formula 2 reduces to Cauchy's formula 1 as dU/dt)partial approaches zero.

The time-dependent Rieman tensor R relates the curvature of spacetime to the energy density U in a strange way:

Curvature C is equal to or proportional to the energy density (C = const1 .E . . . 4).

This relationship is false and misleading, because the correct relationship should be: curvature is inversely proportional to U ( .U x C = Const2 . . . 5), in accordance with the universal law of the 4D Lorentz transformation, which implies that the unitary space xyzt is constant or conserved during its motion. But here is the satanic trap into which Einstein irretrievably fell by following or trying to prove the wrong relation 4 instead of the correct one 5. The author assumes that Einstein did not understand physics to the point of assuming that the relationship between space curvature and energy density is one of proportionality, where space curvature should be inversely proportional to energy density, as implied by the universal Lorentz law in 4D physics xyzt:

Spacetime is constant or conserved in motion.

But here's the satanic trap Einstein fell into, irretrievably, by following or attempting to prove the erroneous relation 4 instead of the correct relation 5.

The author assumes that Einstein was so lacking in physics that he assumed the relationship between space curvature and energy density was one of proportionality, where space curvature should be inversely proportional to energy density, as suggested by Lorentz's universal law in 4D xyzt:

Spacetime is constant or conserved in motion.

However, Einstein resorted to his black magic, remembered a thought experiment called black magic, and wrongly proved his false rule in 1915: curvature induces energy density, not the other way around.

The question arises: if Einstein's procedure is flawed, how come his results are perfect? The answer is simple: both equations 4 and 5 can give the same results if the square of the curvature tensor is I (C^2=I), which is the second part of the Satanic trap.