I guess you want to calculate the conc of nanoparticles (nM/pM) in the colloidal solution. If yes and NP are spherical in shape, then you can use the following steps:
a) You know the weight of gold taken for NP synthesis (Au only, not gold salt) = W
b) Density of gold = 19.3 gcm-3
c) Now you calculate the volume of gold taken = W/9.320
d) Calculate the average size of nanoparticles using TEM (make sure nanoparticles are monodispersed) (2R)
e) Calculate the volume of a single nanoparticle (assuming sphere) = 4x(pi x R^3)/3 = V
f) You can calculate the number of particles in colloidal solution (N) = (W/9.32) / V
g) Calculate the conc of NP = N / Final volume of colloidal solution
Please read this paper and article. .http://www.labmanager.com/white-papers-and-application-notes/2012/05/measurement-of-gold-nanoparticle-size-and-concentration-by-spectrophotometry#.UvnG6IG6bqA
You can use the dynamic light scattering (also known as photon correlation spectroscopy or quasi-elastic light scattering) ; this is a technique in physics that can be used to determine the size distribution profile of small particles in suspension.
Once you have the diameter of your particles, you can measure the extinction spectra for quantifying the concentration ( such in Beer's law)
I guess you want to calculate the conc of nanoparticles (nM/pM) in the colloidal solution. If yes and NP are spherical in shape, then you can use the following steps:
a) You know the weight of gold taken for NP synthesis (Au only, not gold salt) = W
b) Density of gold = 19.3 gcm-3
c) Now you calculate the volume of gold taken = W/9.320
d) Calculate the average size of nanoparticles using TEM (make sure nanoparticles are monodispersed) (2R)
e) Calculate the volume of a single nanoparticle (assuming sphere) = 4x(pi x R^3)/3 = V
f) You can calculate the number of particles in colloidal solution (N) = (W/9.32) / V
g) Calculate the conc of NP = N / Final volume of colloidal solution
UV-Vis requres a calibration or you need to know the extinction coefficient for the exact size of gold particles you have. It is not a direct measurement of concentration. The most accurate approach has been mentioned previously....use atomic spectroscopy (AA or ICPMS) to determine total gold. On the other hand, if you used the Turkevich method and you know how much Au salt was added, you already know the total gold concentration. In my experience this value is pretty close to the one determined by ICPMS. Then you need a "mean" size that is relevant...preferrably from TEM or SEM depending on the size of your particles. DLS is not a good choice for obtaining the mean size for the purpose of calculating the particle number concentration, as someone else suggested, since it is prone to artifacts and measures the hydrodynamic size not the core Au size.Once you have Au concentration and a mean size, you can estimate the concenration assuming spherical geometry and the usual parameters (radius of equivalent sphere, Au density). BUT....if you have a polydisperse sample, none of these approaches will work, and your estimate will contain a large error and uncertainty. Establish the uniformity of your product first. IMHO
You can use UV-Visible spectroscopy. By using Beer-Lambert Law, you will be able to determine the concentration. UV vis will give you the peak absorbance and for the values of size dependent molar extinction constant, you can refer literature values.
I sugest a very easy way to obtain the concentration of a nanòparticles concentrarion as I did for Al nanoparticles soln. Select some known valume of solution and obtain its weight. Then evaporate the solvent to obtain the dry product (particles). Reweight it. Now you can calculate nanopartiles solution concentration
Mr. Vincent A. Hackley I read your answer about how to calculate the concentration of AuNPs, would you tell me the equation I need in order to calculate that concentration after has the mean size and concentration of Au salt.
I have tried to determine the concentration of AuNPs by applying either Jitendra Satija's method or Beer's Law at the same time. The results are complementary. But according to Satiga' suggested method, you should be sure the size of AuNP and after calculation of number of AuNPs (F), you need to calculate mol of AuNPs by considering avagadro number ( 1 mol is equal to 6.02 x 10^23), then divide it to volume of the collodial solution.
I compared the results and the deviation is so less :)
Thanks Mr. Sagita. I added a new AuNP concentration calculation method :)
Inductively coupled plasma mass spctroscopy (ICPMS) can be used to find concentration of various inroganic materials up to micro grams. We have used it to determine amount of gold (ug/ml) in gold nanoparticles dispersion to calculate dose and to compare with gold solution of known concetration.
If I would need to find out the concentration of doped nanoparticles(such as NaGdF4 doped Er, and Yb nanoparticles), I don't know the common density of these nanoparticles but the individuals. In this context how would Mr, Satija's procedure will helpful for me , or any others.
I know the M.W, particle size and so the volume, but at some point, I need to know the density of nanoparticles.
You can use Turkevich method to synthesize gold nanoparticles. In this procedure, HAuCl4 is reduced by NaCit. According to the volume of NaCit, you can adjust the size of AuNPs. The important point is that there is an inverse ratio between the size of AuNPs and the volume of NaCit added. I attached one of our publications, which we synthesize 13 nm AuNPs. In order to synthesize 21-29 nm AuNPs, you are suppose to decrease the volume of NaCit. Moreover, the concentration of our protocol is 14 nM. by centrifugation method, you obtain 17 nM AuNPs, whose sizes are around 20-30 nm.
Good luck :)
Article Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering to Evaluate Nanomaterial C...
I think it is hard, maybe impossible, to calculate the concentration of your doped nanoparticles by Mr. Sajita's method. you can use Beer's law, which is A=E x I x C. you can prepare diluted samples such as 1:10, 1:100, 1:100. by this way, you can find E, extinction factor of your nanoparticle. then, you can measure the UV absorbance of your undilute NP suspension. you know the E and A, so you can find the concentration of NP suspension. I can suggest that you may go back from Mr. Satija's procedure to find the density of your nanoparticle. you found the concentration, find moles, find the volume of a single NP if it is spherical, 4/3 x pi x r3, bla bla.....
If you have unknown gold nanoparticles concentration and you diluted your sample(1:10, 1:100, 1:1000...) after that you use UV and Beer's law, what should be the UNIT of the slope Exl=(Aj-Ai)/(Cj-Ci)
The unit of E, extinction coefficient, is M-1 cm-1. E changes according to the size of AuNPs. You can find some theoritical calculations in the literatures and also in the some websites. In the article named as "Extinction coefficient of gold nanoparticles with different sizes and different capping ligands", you may find the answer of your question. As much as I know, there is a relationship between concentration and extinction coefficient of a substance. Therefore, I am not sure about the unit of E obtained by that slope. I can suggest you to check the literature by depending the size of your AuNPs. You will see some values, which are similar to each other. The most important thing is the 10^what. For example, the E of 13 nm AuNPs is around 2- 5 x 10^8 M-1 cm-1, based on literature. You can find your slope value and then you can add this 10^blato the slope value, so you found the E :)).
Actually I want to explain that you can not apply that equation in case of a mass concentration g/L or number of particles/L. My question how can you convert a mass concentration of NPs to molar concentration?
when preparing diluted samples, you do not have to know the concentartion of NPs in the solution. you would know only dilution factors. For concentration values, you would use dilution factors. for instance, 1:10 diluted NP suspension will be scanned by UV/Vis and the maximum absorbance will be at 520 nm. the value at 520 nm will be recorded. Then, 1:20 diluted sample will be scanned and the value at 520 nm will be recorded,.... and more dilutions and their absorbance values. then, you will draw absorbance vs dilution factor graph. the slope will be extinction factor. the point is that you are suppose to multiple the slope value with 10^-9 if it it nm size. you can compare the experimental result with the theoritical E values. Moreover, you can do the same thing for AgNPs.
You are write. I wrote it as 10^-9 but it must be positive, 10^+9. Sorry. I confused it with the units, M^-1 cm^-1. As a result, you are write, you are suppose to multiple the slope with 10^+9.
Kindly can you please tell me what is 9.32 in above calculation? I am using PLGA for nanoparticle preparation (25 mg PLGA in total final volume 25 ml with density 1.34 gcm-3) and unable to understand calculation. radius of nanoparticle is 90 nm.
you should do the math your own. You need to determine yield. Get the mass concentration. For calculating particle concentration you need to determine size distribution.
With reference to the comments about Dynamic Light Scattering, it is correct to say that traditionally this would not have been a suitable approach to quantify particle concentration, however a number of recent developments in both algorithms and analysis has lead to the introduction of robust particle concentration measurements via DLS which yield results comparable to counting based techniques but in a calibration free, batch method.
Here are application notes that discuss this on the new Zetasizer Ultra.