As AI and quantum technologies come together to revolutionize computing, it’s important to set clear legal guidelines. These laws should protect privacy, ensure security, and prevent misuse, while promoting fair access and innovation. The challenge is making sure these rules balance progress with ethical and societal considerations.
The integration of AI and quantum computing can only be sustainable if supported by a clear legal framework. Such a framework should ensure privacy protection through data minimization, privacy impact assessments, and secure encryption; guarantee security by adopting post-quantum cryptography, certification of systems, and mandatory incident reporting; promote equity by requiring bias testing, encouraging open standards, and ensuring fair access to quantum resources; and strengthen accountability by defining liability, maintaining human oversight in high-risk applications, and fostering international regulatory cooperation. In this way, law can unlock the benefits of AI–quantum integration while safeguarding privacy, security, and fairness.
@Aftabhaider From my research findings, AI, IT, and legal experts unanimously agree on the necessity of ongoing government intervention in regulatory and legislative frameworks. This intervention must be coupled with consistent and persistent human oversight, aligned with the Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) and Human-on-the-Loop (HOTL) models as fundamental components of trustworthy governance.
This position is reinforced in recent scholarship—for instance, Elmahjub (2023) and UNESCO (2023) highlight the importance of embedding HITL and HOTL approaches to ensure accountability, transparency, and ethical safeguards in AI governance. A wider body of literature similarly underscores the role of these models in maintaining meaningful human control across the lifecycle of advanced technologies.
For further insights, you may refer to my article, The Artificial Intelligence and Dispute Resolution in Brunei: Assessing Readiness, Legal Reform, and the Way Forward, published in the Indonesian Law Review of Emerging Jurisprudence (ILREJ), available at: https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/ilrej/article/view/40541/17147
Legal frameworks must prioritize privacy, security, and equity in guiding AI–quantum integration. On privacy, scholars stress the need to prohibit quantum-enabled surveillance and adopt encryption standards resistant to quantum decryption. For security, regulations should mandate risk assessments, audit trails, and international cooperation on quantum-safe protocols to guard against misuse. Regarding equity, laws must prevent monopolization, encourage open access, and ensure fair distribution of resources so quantum-AI benefits do not deepen the digital divide Embedding Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) and Human-on-the-Loop (HOTL) oversight reinforces accountability and trust, ensuring these technologies serve society responsibly. (Adi Syohreni,2025; Elmahjub, 2023; Chiodo, Fitzsimons, & McCutcheon, 2025; UNESCO, 2023)
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Organizational Psychology
- Training