I am having some problem in writing evaluation section of my research paper. By some experiment i have collected some data as,
Source fault discover rate
Existing Proposed
A 74% 94%
B 68% 90%
As you can see for system A fault discover rate is 74% where new approach's fault discover rate is 94%. That means new approach discover 20% more fault that existing approach.
1. How i can mention this analysis in my paper?
Another thing is for system A, to achieve 78% fault, 20 test cases are needed. On the other hand for 94%, 30 test cases are required. So for getting 20% more fault discover rate 20 more test cases are required. So is a positive thing?
2. How can i mention this issue?
Dear Muhammad,
If I understood your question correctly, a new approach gives better results compared to old one but needs more tests. Maybe it is advisable to present table with extended numbers of columns:
If it is possible, of course (I don't know if 10 tests are additional or all tests are different).
And after presenting the table results can be described very simply.
And I think that 10 more tests are not realy positive thing, but if tests do their work they may be carried out.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science