For the impact factor portions of your question, you can likely develop an opinion after looking into the definitions and how they are calculated, and if this is an important factor to you and where you submit.
In terms of where to submit, the advice I usually give is that when you are doing your research you often find certain papers from a given small set of journals that you find most informative and useful to you. From this set of papers a new researcher can often find select the right journal. While there are lots of journals, there are a limited number that are appropriate for a given area of research. From this smaller set, it should have guided you to where the paper will find its best audience (e.g., if a methods paper, applications, summary, etc.). Good luck to you in your research!
Also, regarding blacklist. Can have a look at the blog by Beall, Scholarly Open Access. It has a list of Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers. Can search by publisher or specific journal. By journal link is below:
Many thanks for your perfect answer and useful links. Also Paid Access and Classification of journals are obscure issues for me and some of new researcher. May you explain those options?
Thanks a lot for your attention, time and complete answers.
Do you think which factors can be more effective and important factors than IMPACT FACTOR in process of finding a convenient journal for submit my article?
I'm glad to to see your answer. Thanks a lot for your perfect guidance and useful links.
May you explain about which factors are most important to find/choose a convenient journal for submit an article?(Such as 5-year impact, current impact factor, paid access and classification of journal)
Thank you for your guidance for finding journal. I understand about the main question. But up to present moment, no one answer to the another questions (May you explain about which factors are most important to find/choose a convenient journal for submit an article?(Such as 5-year impact, current impact factor, paid access and classification of journal))
I think the range of possible journals, the importance (or not) of impact factors etc. have been well explained & various links have been provided. I think however, that YOU have to decide what is important to YOU ...
Local - National - International: who is your audience, and will your work cater for their needs?
Peer-review or non peer-review: what type of article do you want to write, and does it need peer-review?
Prestigious journal or one that is less known - how is a particular journal going to get your work in front of those who can use it best?
Do you need to meet someone else's expectations (e.g. only publish in high IF journals, in English etc.)?
Pay or not? Do you have funds - do you think it worthwhile or valid?
Niche-specific or a more inter-disciplinary journal - who would benefit most from your work?
These types of question are only answerable by YOU, so other than giving you something more to think about .... I don't think I have answered your question either !!
The question has already been well answered by the researchers, but let me add my reply.
Impact factor is measured by Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report (JCR) based on based on specific algorithm. 5 year impact factor maintains and calculates the cumulative impact factor of a journal for last five years. Whereas, current impact factor only calculates the impact within the current single year.
Paid Access refers to journal libraries and databases that require paid subscription to their databases, for a user to download their resource (i.e Research papers, book chapters, datasets, etc). Mostly universities already have subscription to these libraries, such as ACM, IEEE, SCOPUS, etc.
Classification of journals in my point of view (I may be wrong here) refers to the three tiers of ranking for journals, i.e Tier-1, Tier-2, and Tier-3 journals.
"The citation system simply decides the ranking. It is a simple calculation. The total number of citations and articles over a period of two years, to get the impact factor for a journal. The total journal titles in a specific subject category are then arranged by the impact factor in descending order. After this, they are divided equally into four groups. The first group reflects the top 25% of journal titles and is referred to as Tier 1. Tier 2 contains the next 26-50%, Tier 3 from 51 to 75% and finally Tier 4 is for the rest from 76 to 100%. The tier levels can change as the impact factors of the journals change. Similarly, it can also change with the increase or decrease in the total
It depends what you are looking for. If you are just starting and you have a small interesting paper not a high impact paper that would potentially interest Science or Nature then i would find a decent journal in your field and publish there. You need to figure out what you audience is (i do not know where you are in your field i am guessing you are advanced). If you want more say seismologists to read it then if it fits it should go to BSSA classic journal for seismologists. If it has another audience or a wider audience you might want for example Natural Hazards.
Generally speaking peer review journals (these are the only ones we have in Geophysics) are definitely better. If you want to advance in your academic career you want scientific journals that go through peer review. Conference papers are good but i would keep them brief and then make a more detailed study for a journal article. Since you are in Civil Engineering EERI journals are good. For me that I also look at Coastal Engineering audience other journals could also be useful. Thank you
Please go for the publications Science direct, Inderscience, Taylor & Francis, Sage, Springer, Cambridge and Wileyonline etc. are the standard publications having most of their journal are SCI indexed which are the most preferable in current scenario and have almost impact factor above 1.
Thank you for convenient guidance. What is your idea about ASCE Journals (American Society of Civil Engineering)? I need to find POROUS MEDIA/Hydraulic engineering audience in Civil engineering.
I think that the aims and scopes of Journal of Hydrologic Engineering and Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering (ASCE) are related to my case study (Article).
i think generally speaking ASCE has good journals. It is the main organisation representing Civil Engineers in the US and internationally. Definitely a good place to publish. So do not worry about it early stage. First write your paper and before it is finalised see ASCE and possibly other publishing companies like your colleague very nicely mentioned above. I am also in the editorial board and reviewer of some David Publishing journals but Springer is also big as well as some others.
Thanks a lot for your answer. I should suggest some reviewers to which journal that I want to submit my article. Do you allow me to introduce you as one of my reviewers suggestion? My article is about a new method to analysed the flow through porous media in network modeling.
Thank you for your attention, time, perfect guidance. May you tell me some information about the PhD positions in Brazil? (For international students-In Water Engineering, Civil Engineering)
Dear Seyed Mehdi, i think young researchers and students are always supervised by elder researchers, advisers, and professors. So the best and easy mean is to follow their advises and their customs with their publishing editors
The appropriate journal depends of your used language, the notoriety you like to get, the aid you are disposed to give to the editors or societies, etc. With all it is possible to pass a time without success, but if you descend the ribbon it would be more easy to find a place for your research.
The new researchers are always in need for senior researcher to guide them from A to Z and one of the issue is the selection process which should be for good journal which fits with the manuscript
Context of the work, audience reach and the time taken in publication are the major determining factors for selection of journal. However, the process by which a journal decides to accept or reject a given article is often mysterious. The area of publication is rapidly changing, with new publication opportunities like open access electronic journals in addition to traditional print journals that are also adopting new technology. The prime of publishing research is to communicate findings and ideas to a broader audience than one's immediate circle. Another aspect is repute and scientific standing of the journals as they certify the scientific value of an individual author's work. They provide access to reliable knowledge, and at the same time confer scholarly prestige that facilitates career advancement. At best, the right choice of a journal should be aimed at rapid publication of an article that achieves the exposure and credit it deserves. Pl refer following thread:-
I suggest you to follow regularly the scientific publications of your area and speciality. Try to publish in scientific conferences, have a good professional relationship with your colleagues working at the same or similar subjects.
In my opinion, the criteria for choosing a good journal may be different from one researcher to another. A researcher may give more priority to speed while another may give priority to who is the publisher. Sometimes, you can save time if you send your paper to the appropriate journal instead of waiting a long time until you get an approval or rejection from a higher impact journal.
Best way is to select the journal among st the journals , which you have cited in references. In my view, Journals should be from well known publishers/ society.
In my view, detailed critical comments of the reviewers are the most important aspect and it can change the entire shape of the manuscript. My experience says, papers rejected by Talanta got published in Analyst; papers rejected by Analyst got published in Analytica Chimica Acta ; papers rejected by Analytica Chimca Acta got published in Talanta; paper rejected meant for symposium got published in International- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) journal and so on........... Of course, after revision of the manuscript as per the comments of the reviewer/ sometime without revision too and beyond doubt, it gives an opportunity to the authors to think ahead. I have a tendency to discuss my papers again and again even after its publication.
In my view, any research publication, should not be for the sake of publication and it should find real applications in our day to day analysis. From my experiences, for real advancement of science, always chose a journal having high impact factors for publications because of their superior reviewing process and constructive comments for future research.
Dear Dr. S. M. Mohammadizadeh, My publications on uranium including letter to the editor/comments are interesting. I advise you to be very careful in citing references without reading the full text of the published manuscript. In fact, I tried my best and appealed to the respective editors to retract some such unscientific publications.
Dear Seyed Mehdi, I have asked myself the very same question. I studied at UPM that has several journals. One of these is Journal of Social Science and Humanities (JSSH). It's indexed in Scopus. Recently I published a paper in this journal. (Journals blacklisted here in my country are in the link.)
In 2013, I attended an international conference in Penang where I presented 2 papers. I met 2 editors of journals, and I submitted papers in 2014, 2015 to these journals. All these journals are not indexed in Thomson Reuters, but the peer review is excellent. On RG, I now collaborate with others, and sometimes one of us will be the corresponding author. I intend to continue with this collaboration in the future, because I like communicating research. I agree with Prof Rathore that good peer review helps to improve my writing.
Thank you for inviting me to share my ideas about your question.
The truth is that I did not know how to properly choose a journal for an investigation. At my university, journals with high impact factor in JCR or SCOPUS obviously are the most valued, but as you assume the waiting list in such journals and the difficulty getting published is very high.
Long ago, in a course that I attended on this subject, the speaker said it was important to consider the "youth" of the journal and movement in its impact factor. That is, a young magazine is better (because its waiting list for review is shorter) with an impact factor climbing to an older whose impact factor begins to decrease. His justification was that no journal to choose to think about today but year or year and a half, when, if you're lucky, your paper will be published.
Beside Impact Factor, there are too many factors but I think paid access and review time are more important than others. as you know for some journal assigning an editor take 1 year long!!! so beware of them.
Your answer is highly appreciated. The points of view that you stated about choosing the good publishing journal is rich and valuable (Pay access & Review time).
if you can find its name in this website, it means it is a good and ISI journal.
if you can not find it here, you should doubt about it.
some indian journal said they have impact factor, but when you check it in this website they do not. it means they announce a fake impact factor.
in this website, you can also search to find proper journal for your article, just write your keyword and search, then the list of journal that have that keyword on their name will be appear, you could see the impact factor, difficulty, and the time of publication for each journal..
An appropriate journal could be one in which the editors have treat with the author, for example, they have been teachers of the author, or they have studied in the same universities. Because the origin of their knowledge is common and it is possible to find synnergies, feedback and collaboration more easily. The author could be comprehended with more afinity.
http://www.iran-moshaver.ir/1393/03/09/%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA-%DA%98%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84-%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%B1-isi/#.V0m9KTV97IV Where is the latest and most complete fake and hijacked journal? - ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Where_is_the_latest_and_most_complete_fake_and_hijacked_journal [accessed Aug 17, 2016].
The aim of scientific research is the publication of the document, confirming the scientific achievements and notifies colleagues profession. Scientific experiment, whatever the impressive results it may give, not complete as long as the results are not published.
Scientific publications - this article is not about science or scientific topic in the mass or popular science magazine. Scientific literature and scientific publications is a summary of the results of original experimental or theoretical research in original papers, as well as their synthesis and analysis in the review articles, monographs, and they are intended primarily for professionals and researchers. Articles are placed in professional journals. For modern scientific publications are characterized by the following features. Most journal articles on original research written in accordance with a specific format: introduction, methods, results and discussion (IMRAD format).
The text publications are full of links to other scientific work, so that the reader can find a job, to which reference is made (References, citations).
The publications used illustrations that are described in the text (tables,
There is a detailed description (methods, theoretical calculations,
reasoning, statistical data processing), the results were received and how the author (s) came to the conclusions set out in Publication (methods, materials).
Most valuable publication in peer-reviewed journals (Peer reviewed journals). In this manuscript journal articles are published only after will be critically reviewed and approved by at least two experts (reviewers).
The publication is always open and available to all readers without any restrictions (permanent available for public). To become qualified science as the primary, it should be properly published. Even if you make a good research paper properly written, but it is published in the "wrong" edition, it can not be considered a primary publication. It happens, and vice versa: the article even on a modest study can be "correct" if it has been properly published in the primary (right) the scientific literature.