I have been facing the issue of False negative results in both Dengue IgG & IgM assays. I have tried various buffer compositions with commonly known blockers to resolve sample interference but unable to resolve the false negative issue.
Hi,
To begin, it is crucial to carefully follow the kit guidelines, paying close attention to details. Incorrect execution of these steps significantly raises the likelihood of obtaining inaccurate results. Various factors contribute to this, such as improper sample collection, storage, and handling, as well as issues like the low sensitivity of certain ELISA tests as they cannot detect low quantities of analytes. Challenges may also arise from cross-reactions, where the assay detects substances other than the target analyte, and the quality of reagents. Notably, the Prozone/Postzone effect is a key concern, where elevated antibody/antigen levels interfere with antigen-antibody complexes properly, leading to false-negative results. Overcoming this effect is possible through sample dilution. The Hook effect is important and it can describe the stage of diseases as well especially the early stage. Again, sample dilution can address this issue. In conclusion, optimizing assay conditions, when necessary, is paramount to obtaining reliable results in ELISA.
False-negative results in Dengue IgG and IgM assays can be challenging to address, and resolving such issues often requires a systematic approach. Here are some common reasons for false-negative results and potential strategies to troubleshoot the problem:
Possible Causes of False-Negative Results:
Troubleshooting Strategies:
If the false-negative issue persists, it may be beneficial to collaborate with a clinical laboratory specialist or a diagnostic testing expert who can provide more personalized guidance based on the specifics of your testing environment and patient population. Additionally, reaching out to the manufacturer's technical support for troubleshooting assistance can be valuable.
The occurrence of false negatives and false positives in your results is intricately linked to the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic protocol. One effective strategy for optimization involves utilizing known positives and known negatives during the experimental procedure. Subsequently, the development of a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve can aid in identifying an optimal cutoff point. This is the point at which both sensitivity and specificity approach 100%. We trust this suggestion proves beneficial to your work.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Methodology
- Research Methodology
- Research Papers