I've read a great deal about rhizoanalysis, but would be interested to hear people's personal experience with this Deleuzian approach to research. Please share your personal experience (as opposed to published examples, of which I have dozens and dozens), with an eye to tips, advice, or lessons learned.
Also, I realize it's a highly reflexive process and usually single-authored research. Has anyone applied rhizoanalysis with a group of researchers? Or does that defeat the type of interpretation and reflexivity called for?
I understand you got enough published articles, but I precisely describe my personal experience with such an approach in the following article:
http://ant.sagepub.com/content/16/1/98.abstract
If you have further questions, I'd be happy to talk about it.
Good luck!
Thank you Alain - this is really interesting, and I like the topic! If I have any questions I'll message you. Really appreciate it.
I use Deleuze in much of my work -- you might find interesting a paper I co-authored with Lindsay Stephens, another on Deleuze I published in TCS, a third in Philosophy Today -- I think its important not to extract a single concept from Deleuze's philosophy but understand how they interact - would be interested to hear more about your work.
Hi Laura,
I realise you asked this question three years ago but just in case you or anyone reading this is interested, I found a 2015 feature article by Marg Sellers called '...working with (a) rhizoanalysis ... working (with) a rhizoanalysis' which works with "Deleuzo-Guattarian philosophical imaginaries" very much in line with your query.
I found it here: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1074505.pdf
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Psychology
- Attitude