Looking at other questions and answers regarding typical cloning procedures (restriction-ligation), I notice almost everyone suggests to GEL purify DNA at several steps. For example ; after a PCR amplification and prior to restriction digestion ; or after a restriction digestion and prior to ligation.

Knowing gel purification often leads to the loss of >90% of initial DNA, as well as making it near impossible to evaluate quality and quantity of DNA by nanodrop measurement, why would it be recommended over a simple PCR-purification (column) ?

The way I see things, PCR-purification will remove primers (from PCR), short DNA stretches (from digestion of a PCR fragment), and will also change the buffer to a neutral one. Also, one can always run a few microliters of a PCR product or vector linearization on a gel to check for purity/complete digestion, and then do a PCR purification on the remaining volume.

Note : I am aware gel purification is essential when removing a chunk of a plasmid by digestion. However, I don't see the point when the vector is only linearized or the insert come from a PCR amplification.

What is your input on this topic ? Gel-purif or PCR-purif ?

  • Similar topics
  • Gels
More Martin Chenal's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions