I am looking for some articles or guidance on redundancy analysis for second-order formative construct using SmartPLS. If the first-order construct is reflective and the second-order is formative (Type II: reflective-formative relationship), is it necessary to assess the convergent validity through redundancy analysis? If yes, then how can i do this?
Dear Husna,
Here are some guidelines for your case:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMDS-07-2016-0286/full/html
Best regards,
Florian
Dear Husna
For formative measure, you need to follow the standard measurement model assessment regardless of first or second order. Hence, to answer your question, Yes. You should perform redundancy analysis.
Both the first and second edition of " Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications." provide very clear guidelines on how to assess Type II: reflective-formative.
The following papers are very helpful:
Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models, Jan-Michael Becker, Kristina Klein, Martin Wetzels 2012
Article Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines f...
Good luck!
Regards
mei peng
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Statistical Techniques
- Structural Equation Modeling