Nowadays it is still difficult to judge technical solutions, since they are evaluated based on different methods. In 2014 we proposed an assessment model, based on a new taxonomy, for the comparison of opportunistic routing protocols. I'm wondering if our evaluation guideline, performance metrics and experimental setup is helping designers in evaluating solutions through fair comparisons. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.8372
Dear Paulo Milheiro Mendes,
various Routing Metrics have been provided for use in the IoT. My Figure shows which Metrics are involved.
For more Information on the Meaning of these Metrics see address:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326960652_RPL_Routing_Metrics_and_Constraints
Best regards
Anatol Badach
I would suggest pushing the metric discussion "down" to a lower level in the protocol stack. What about multiple pathing with packet redundancy and the associated reconciliation issues?
For the performance Evaluation of protocol it depends of goal of develop protocol. For example to utilize bandwidth efficiently when need to evaluate with respect to overhead.another example, in case of real time application we need to develop protocol with respect to decrease end to end delay and packet loss. Moreover, in case with limited energy node such as UAV, we need to develop protocol with respect to energy efficiency.
- Badges
- Science topic