Information and light are disparate. Information transfers with sound and light depending on what the information is. Maybe airflow can also be information. The signals containing information may transfer with the eyes when I believe that consciousness can move information. There are many ways to transfer information. Therefore, we can not simply compare the speed of light and information.

Dear Emannoul Emmanouil Markoulakis ,

Actually, changes are happening... You have defined these changes in your imagination. But you must have real information about this, but you can have it only with the speed of light. Rather, it should be explained why the slowed down light becomes fast again?

Based on the answer to this last question, I think the change you say is instantaneous also happens at the speed of light.

One problem is why real physical phenomena need to be degraded to information!

There are phenomena faster than the speed of light, but we cannot detect (have INFORMATION) about them with our instruments!

On the other hand, the question is good because it is thought-provoking and helps to awaken new thoughts while we search for the answer.

Regards,

Laszlo

Dear László Attila Horváth ,

Well the "established" physics says that light because it is massless cannot accelerate or decelerate in any way. The transition in the interface is INSTANTANEOUS thus timeless, zero time.

You could explain this phenomenon though as another nonlocal quantum effect.

My aim here with this, is to prove that I don't need any proof really to prove that the theory is not physical, incomplete at least and self-conflicting.

Best Regards,

Emmanouil

Dear Emmanouil Markoulakis ,

Then I'm looking forward to seeing what you and your partner get out of it.

If your inspiration is bad, it will be immediately noticeable to someone who focuses on objective reality.

One of your starting points can already be said to be inaccurate! Based on this, it will follow that there will be more!

Regards,

Laszlo

Dear László Attila Horváth ,

"One of your starting points can already be said to be inaccurate!..."

Which one? Explain?

I just said what is the current consensus in the literature. That does not mean that I agree with it!

Best Regards,

Emmanouil

Dear Emmanouil Markoulakis ,

I don't want to influence you, the result will be much more valuable this way.

Regards,

Laszlo

László Attila Horváth

Well, we imply that there is a hidden particle possible in the dark sector, faster than the photon.

The arguemant here is, that something updates the speed of light faster than light or even timeless INSTANTLY.