¿Porqué los artículos que se publican en la afamada revista C3 Bioeconomy, no tienen un DOI para cada artículo y el que figura en la revista no sirve para incorporarla en Web of Science?
Al parecer no se dieron cuenta como funciona en otras revistas fuera de su gran alcance y reputación
The absence of a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) for articles published in a renowned journal like C3 Bioeconomy raises concerns regarding their accessibility and inclusion in indexing databases like Web of Science. A DOI plays a crucial role in providing a permanent and unique identification for scholarly articles, enhancing their visibility, and facilitating their retrieval.
Without individual DOIs for each article, it becomes challenging for researchers to accurately cite and reference specific works, impacting the journal's visibility and citation metrics. Moreover, a DOI linked to the publication is often a prerequisite for inclusion in esteemed databases like Web of Science, ensuring the journal's recognition within the scholarly community.
It's crucial for journals, especially prestigious ones like C3 Bioeconomy, to adopt DOI assignment for each article to uphold scholarly standards, facilitate proper referencing, and enable seamless integration into indexing databases. Establishing individual DOIs not only enhances the journal's credibility but also supports researchers in accessing and citing valuable contributions to the field of bioeconomy.
It sounds like there might be an issue with the articles published in C3 Bioeconomy lacking individual DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) or having a DOI that doesn't facilitate inclusion in Web of Science. DOIs are crucial for identifying and accessing specific articles, and they're commonly used for indexing and referencing purposes.
The absence of individual DOIs or issues with the provided DOI can hinder the seamless integration of these articles into databases like Web of Science, which relies on accurate and unique identifiers for indexing publications. This discrepancy might impact the visibility and accessibility of the journal's content within scholarly databases and the broader scientific community.
Ensuring that each article has a distinct and functional DOI is essential for proper citation, indexing, and tracking scholarly work. It might be worthwhile for the journal to address this concern to enhance the accessibility and impact of their published articles within indexing platforms like Web of Science.
Assigning a DOI to an entire volume rather than individual articles within a journal can pose challenges for precise referencing and indexing within academic databases. While providing a DOI for the entire volume ensures a unique identifier, it might not offer the granularity needed to pinpoint specific articles for citation and indexing purposes.
Having individual DOIs for articles allows for more precise identification and tracking of scholarly work. It's particularly crucial for databases like Web of Science, where distinct identifiers aid in accurately cataloging and referencing each piece of research. Without individual DOIs, articles might not be easily searchable or accessible within such databases.
Opting for article-specific DOIs could significantly enhance the visibility and impact of each piece of research, enabling seamless integration into various scholarly databases and ensuring proper recognition and citation by other researchers. It might be beneficial for C3 Bioeconomy to consider assigning individual DOIs to their articles to improve their discoverability and accessibility within academic platforms.
Gracias por las aclaraciones Dr. Zúniga. Justamente formulé la pregunta porque recientemente con el Dr. Carlos Menéndez Gámiz nos publicó esta afamada revista un artículo. La pena como Usted señala es que al no tener un DOI individual, WoS o Scopus no reconocen el artículo. El consuelo es que El Sevier si lo hizo.
Dear Jorge León Quiroga Canaviri I think the good news is that this journal assigns the DOI's with some delay. Upto 2022 all papers seem to have a legit DOI (the journal claims to be member of CrossRef so this makes sense).
I am afraid that you make a link between papers having a DOI assigned and being indexed in WoS and/or Scopus. This is not true. Though having papers with a DOI assigned is an indication of the publishers 'quality' it takes more to get a journal indexed in one of Clarivate's indexes (ESCI, SCIE, SSCI) or Scopus.
See for more info on what it takes for example here:
https://www.centre-mersenne.org/en/index-your-journal-in-the-web-of-science/
https://blog.scholasticahq.com/post/how-to-get-journals-indexed-scopus/
Best regards.
PS. So to be clear a journal needs to be indexed in WoS or Scopus and not individual papers.
Estimado Rob Keller, agradezco la buena noticia y la respuesta con todos los detalles descritos. Las recomendaciones serán tomadas en cuenta y la aclaración final sobre donde debe estar indexada la revista, cierra el círculo de la consulta que se formuló.
Atentos Saludos.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Phytochemistry
- Extracts