I created a theory that tells us that it does. There is a lot of research in the field and I evaluate two seminal papers;

a) Lunar Ranging Data Analysis

b) SN1a Data Analysis

Both tells us that there isn't any real epoch-dependence on the Gravitational Constant.

Here I rebut those articles and show that glaring mistakes (assuming as a hypothesis something that forces the conclusion). That would be ok is the hypothesis made any sense, but in this case it does not.

Please, if you are a real astronomer, professor of astronomy (as opposed to self-described specialist on astronomy and cosmology), please defend this article:


I say that because, only the opinion of real experts are relevant. Opinions of other people will not change this debate.

More Marco Pereira's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions