Languages are semiotic systems, that is, systems that create meaning (through concepts for instance). These work as patterns of relevance and thus point out what "matters" to the speakers (ex: there exist several spectrums of colours described by different languages). Words and metaphors bear meaning and direct the attention of speakers to precise phenomena. Thus, a language may to a certain extent reflect a society's practice of the world, as a certain variation of a language may impact and redirect the society's attentive Energy to other phenomena (ex: gender neutral pronouns). Still, there are no "pure" language in the sense that languages are based on a multiplicity of variations that differ according factors such as geography, identities, social-class, and so on.

Thank you Talilah.

I would say that there is a great influence of the Society on the language and its behavior. Taking into account terms such as: "linguistic attitude" or "linguistic identity". The first refers to the responses that as individuals or a community we make to the use of the language of a certain individual or social group, these can be: rejection, acceptance, prestige, pride. It also has a great influence on the adoption, use or study of a language. so that, if a language has prestige, the more likely it is to be reproduced or spoken; Quite the opposite happens with languages ​​that do not enjoy that prestige, due to disuse, they are gradually forgotten until they become extinct. On the other hand, linguistic identity is the link we have with a speaking community. Duzak (2002) indicates that we do not develop a single linguistic identity, but rather that according to situations and contexts we adapt a multiplicity of identities.

However, taking into account aspects such as the use of language in a community, and its impact on the modification and acceptance of certain rules regarding speech, we find phenomena such as the insertion of terms that we could consider incorrect in the Dictionary of the Real Language Academy.