yeah it should be that ,because the moisture come from water

https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/earth-science/weather/moisture-in-the-atmosphere

Maybe this might help, but it’s a complex subject. You may put a humidifier to increase air moisture, a dehumidifier to reduce moisture in home or room scale. But turn off equipment, and it eventually returns to about local weather level. It’s a matter of scale - we can experiment with weather balloons or change our home environment. If one would clear cut a forest stand and convert to grass, there would be less evapotranspiration and more streamflow at its local watershed scale. So conceptually, some degree of hydrologic cycle modification is possible. The scale of a forest stand would not be enough to make measured change at atmospheric scale, and there could be some difficulty measuring at local scale due to wind and weather patterns. But at the atmospheric scale, doubtful we could individually find a way we could extract enough water to make any noticeable or permanent difference, as the drier the air, the more evapotranspiration demand exerted on open water and plants. Adjacent moister areas can move to drier areas, so changes we exert to water cycle at local scale are difficult to express at earth atmosphere scale. If we consider all human activity, all modifications, perhaps there is potential for change, but how might we measure it at that scale. If there were measures that could cool the atmosphere, that would theoretically increase condensation and reduce moisture content in air. A warming planet atmosphere could hold more moisture, higher humidity and reduce evapotranspiration demand and condensation. But this scenario also includes greater potential For extreme events.