There are different types of Laws, physical, mathematical and legal. Does the legal system need to be updated because of a direct incompatibility with the ideas of ergodicity in the mathematics of frequency mechanics having physical implications in the electromagnetic spectrum?
For example, brain states are stochastic electromagnetic. They are also ergodic.
Does treating different individuals in the legal system as everyone under one legal system represent the individualities essential to the individual that is ultimately unique unto themselves with respect to their brain states.
What do the legal studies believe about the factual actual reality, in the light of this fake news era, in regards to change and changes of change? Do they subscribe and participate, infiltrate, dominate, or adversely affect the discussions in the liberal arts of English Studies, where they define a whole 600 page textbook worth of terms that are known as hallucinations because apparently they "simply cannot ever be true". Ideas such as out of body projection, and synaesthesia could be studied for their usefulness in treating mental health disorders. As could many of the other "spirits" that are mentioned in the textbook.
Does scientific dogma dictate the ability to question this linguistic dogma?
Does the 2000 year old chinese historical account about cannabis saying that after 100 days of consumption one gains the ability to see the "spirits", mean that the "spirits" accounted for in the 600 page textbook known as hallucinations, could indeed be other forma available to perception, and crucial to studying the brain in all it states of function. Is our account of hallucinations simply a way of disregarding other cultural accounts (if we dissolve the idea of culture through diversity in genetics, then we end up with an individual-vs-individual account, which means that yes, this is the case).
- Badges
- Science topic