I'm doing a Systematic Review about papers which assess validity and reliability of sport technology, but I don't find any Checklist to evaluate the individual quality of this kind of studies. I've reviewed the checklist proposed for Cross-sectional designs (the kind of papers I'm going to include in the revision), but they are very generic.
Do you want a checklist to evaluation the quality of study? I recommend the site http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html. Hope this helped, let me know if you have further questions.
Hola Alejandro:
Adjunto solicitado:
Prefered Reporting Items for Systematics Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines
Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, Mulrow, C, Gøtzsche, PC, Ioannidis, JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62: e1–e34, 2009.
Saludos
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Statistics
- Probability
- Probability Theory
- Reliability